visual3d:references
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
visual3d:references [2024/11/15 19:01] – [IORfoot] wikisysop | visual3d:references [2024/11/15 20:24] (current) – wikisysop | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 475: | Line 475: | ||
The iliotibial band (ITB) has an important role in knee mechanics and tightness can cause patellofemoral maltracking. This study investigated the effects of increasing ITB tension on knee kinematics. Nine fresh-frozen cadaveric knees had the components of the quadriceps loaded with 175 N. A Polaris optical tracking system was used to acquire joint kinematics during extension from 100° to 0° flexion. This was repeated after the following ITB loads: 30, 60 and 90 N. There was no change with 30 N load for patellar translation. On average, at 60 and 90 N, the patella translated laterally by 0.8 and 1.4 mm in the mid flexion range compared to the ITB unloaded condition. The patella became more laterally tilted with increasing ITB loads by 0.7°, 1.2° and 1.5° for 30, 60 and 90 N, respectively. There were comparable increases in patellar lateral rotation (distal patella moves laterally) towards the end of the flexion cycle. Increased external rotation of the tibia occurred from early flexion onwards and was maximal between 60° and 75° flexion. The increase was 5.2°, 9.5° and 13° in this range for 30, 60 and 90 N, respectively. Increased tibial abduction with ITB loads was not observed. The combination of increased patellar lateral translation and tilt suggests increased lateral cartilage pressure. Additionally, | The iliotibial band (ITB) has an important role in knee mechanics and tightness can cause patellofemoral maltracking. This study investigated the effects of increasing ITB tension on knee kinematics. Nine fresh-frozen cadaveric knees had the components of the quadriceps loaded with 175 N. A Polaris optical tracking system was used to acquire joint kinematics during extension from 100° to 0° flexion. This was repeated after the following ITB loads: 30, 60 and 90 N. There was no change with 30 N load for patellar translation. On average, at 60 and 90 N, the patella translated laterally by 0.8 and 1.4 mm in the mid flexion range compared to the ITB unloaded condition. The patella became more laterally tilted with increasing ITB loads by 0.7°, 1.2° and 1.5° for 30, 60 and 90 N, respectively. There were comparable increases in patellar lateral rotation (distal patella moves laterally) towards the end of the flexion cycle. Increased external rotation of the tibia occurred from early flexion onwards and was maximal between 60° and 75° flexion. The increase was 5.2°, 9.5° and 13° in this range for 30, 60 and 90 N, respectively. Increased tibial abduction with ITB loads was not observed. The combination of increased patellar lateral translation and tilt suggests increased lateral cartilage pressure. Additionally, | ||
- | [[#top|Back to Top]]// | + | [[#top|Back to Top]] |
===== Kinematics ===== | ===== Kinematics ===== | ||
- | **Tucker CA, Bagley A, Wesdock K, Church C, Henley J, Masiello G** " | + | **Tucker CA, Bagley A, Wesdock K, Church C, Henley J, Masiello G** " |
- | 2008 - //Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, | + | |
- | In comparison to other joints in the human body, the shoulder complex is particularly reliant on the coordination of active muscle forces to generate both movement and stability during activities using the upper extremities. The resultant imbalance of muscle forces across the shoulder, coupled with the increased reliance on the shoulder for functional mobility, puts the individual with tetraplegia at great risk for developing shoulder pathology. The ability to quantify the movement of the shoulder, and in particular the sequence of shoulder complex movement components within functional tasks, can provide information to better inform clinical and surgical decision making. In this article, we will discuss the impact of tetraplegia on shoulder biomechanics and function, provide an overview of general principles and current status of kinematic modeling of the shoulder complex, and describe emerging applications of quantitative motion analysis of the shoulder complex. | + | |
- | **Hidler J, Wisman W, Neckel N** " | + | **Hidler J, Wisman W, Neckel N** " |
- | 2008 - //Clinical Biomechanics 23 (2008) 1251-1259// | + | Background One of the most popular robot assisted rehabilitation devices used is the Lokomat. Unfortunately, |
- | Background One of the most popular robot assisted rehabilitation devices used is the Lokomat. Unfortunately, | + | |
**Goulermas JY, Howard D, Nester CJ, Jones RE, Ren L** " | **Goulermas JY, Howard D, Nester CJ, Jones RE, Ren L** " | ||
Line 502: | Line 499: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]] | [[#top|Back to Top]] | ||
- | ==== Kinematics, kinetics, methods ==== | + | ===== Kinematics, kinetics, methods |
**Verheul, J, Gregson, W, Lisboa, P, Vanrenterghem, | **Verheul, J, Gregson, W, Lisboa, P, Vanrenterghem, | ||
Line 519: | Line 516: | ||
**Ross, G., Dowling, B., Graham, R., Troje, N. F., Fischer, S. L., Graham, R. B.** (2018) " | **Ross, G., Dowling, B., Graham, R., Troje, N. F., Fischer, S. L., Graham, R. B.** (2018) " | ||
//Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise// | //Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise// | ||
- | Introduction: | + | Introduction: |
**Whatling GM, Evans SL, Holt CA.** " | **Whatling GM, Evans SL, Holt CA.** " | ||
Line 528: | Line 525: | ||
**Richards J, Thewlis D, Selfe J, Cunningham A, Hayes C.** "A biomechanical investigation of a single-limb squat: implications for lower extremity rehabilitation exercise." | **Richards J, Thewlis D, Selfe J, Cunningham A, Hayes C.** "A biomechanical investigation of a single-limb squat: implications for lower extremity rehabilitation exercise." | ||
2008 - //J Athl Train. 2008 Sep-Oct; | 2008 - //J Athl Train. 2008 Sep-Oct; | ||
- | :Abstract\\ \\ CONTEXT: Single-limb squats on a decline angle have been suggested as a rehabilitative intervention to target the knee extensors. Investigators, | + | :Abstract CONTEXT: Single-limb squats on a decline angle have been suggested as a rehabilitative intervention to target the knee extensors. Investigators, |
[PMID: 18833310 Reference] | [PMID: 18833310 Reference] | ||
Line 537: | Line 534: | ||
**Bruening DA, Crewe AN, Buczek FL** "A simple, anatomically based correction to the conventional ankle joint center" | **Bruening DA, Crewe AN, Buczek FL** "A simple, anatomically based correction to the conventional ankle joint center" | ||
2008 - //Clinical Biomechanics 23(10): | 2008 - //Clinical Biomechanics 23(10): | ||
- | Background. Conventional motion analysis studies define the ankle joint center as the midpoint between the most medial and lateral aspects of the malleoli, yet research points toward a more distal joint center location. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate an anatomically based correction that would move the conventional ankle joint center to a more accurate location.\\ \\ Methods. Lower extremity radiographs from 30 pediatric patients were analyzed retrospectively. An offset between the conventional and more accurate ankle joint centers was measured and correlated to other common anatomical measures based on conventional skin mounted marker positions. The best correlated measure was used to define a simple correction factor, which was subsequently evaluated by its effect on six degree-of-freedom ankle joint translations during normal gait (n = 8). Findings. Shank length was found to have the highest bivariate linear correlation (r = 0.89) with the offset. Adjusting the ankle joint center using a percentage of shank length (2.7%) was also as accurate as the regression equation in predicting offset (mean error 0.6 mm, or 6% offset). Adjusting the ankle joint center using this simple percentage resulted in a 25% reduction in mean ankle joint translations during normal gait.\\ \\ Interpretation. The accuracy of the ankle joint center can be increased through a simple, anatomically based correction. This correction may prove beneficial in some kinematic and kinetic applications requiring increased anatomical fidelity. | + | Background. Conventional motion analysis studies define the ankle joint center as the midpoint between the most medial and lateral aspects of the malleoli, yet research points toward a more distal joint center location. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate an anatomically based correction that would move the conventional ankle joint center to a more accurate location. Methods. Lower extremity radiographs from 30 pediatric patients were analyzed retrospectively. An offset between the conventional and more accurate ankle joint centers was measured and correlated to other common anatomical measures based on conventional skin mounted marker positions. The best correlated measure was used to define a simple correction factor, which was subsequently evaluated by its effect on six degree-of-freedom ankle joint translations during normal gait (n = 8). Findings. Shank length was found to have the highest bivariate linear correlation (r = 0.89) with the offset. Adjusting the ankle joint center using a percentage of shank length (2.7%) was also as accurate as the regression equation in predicting offset (mean error 0.6 mm, or 6% offset). Adjusting the ankle joint center using this simple percentage resulted in a 25% reduction in mean ankle joint translations during normal gait. Interpretation. The accuracy of the ankle joint center can be increased through a simple, anatomically based correction. This correction may prove beneficial in some kinematic and kinetic applications requiring increased anatomical fidelity. |
[PMID: 18848739 Reference] | [PMID: 18848739 Reference] | ||
Line 596: | Line 593: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]] | [[#top|Back to Top]] | ||
- | ==== Reaching ==== | + | ===== Reaching |
**Robinson MA, Barton GJ, Lees A, Sett P. (2010)** " | **Robinson MA, Barton GJ, Lees A, Sett P. (2010)** " | ||
// | // | ||
- | STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.\\ \\ OBJECTIVES: To quantify three-dimensional (3D) reachable workspace in different groups of tetraplegic participants and to assess their reaching performance within this workspace.\\ \\ SETTING: Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, UK.\\ \\ METHODS: The 3D reachable workspace of three groups of tetraplegics (NON-OP, operated group (OP) and tetraplegic control group (CON(Tetraplegic)) with varying levels of triceps function together with a healthy control group (CON(Healthy))) was defined by reaching to five target positions (anterior, medial, lateral, superior and inferior) located on the periphery of their workspace. Joint angles and inter-joint co-ordination were analysed after a 3D reconstruction of the thorax, humerus and forearm. The performance related variables of movement time, peak velocity, time-to-peak velocity and curvature index were also examined.\\ \\ RESULTS: The reachable volumes covered were consistent with the level of triceps function as CON(Healthy) covered a significantly greater volume than the tetraplegic groups and in turn the OP covered a larger workspace volume than NON-OP. The reduced workspace of tetraplegics was identified as being due to restrictions in workspace above shoulder height and across the body. Co-ordination data identified some differences in movement patterns but when reaching to targets on the workspace there were no significant differences between the OP and NON-OP groups.\\ \\ CONCLUSION: This study provided a detailed assessment of reachable workspace and target reaching. Tetraplegic participants found the superior and medial parts of the workspace were the most challenging directions. Standardised biomechanical analysis of tetraplegic upper-limb function is required for objective assessment.. | + | STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To quantify three-dimensional (3D) reachable workspace in different groups of tetraplegic participants and to assess their reaching performance within this workspace. SETTING: Northwest Regional Spinal Injuries Centre, UK. METHODS: The 3D reachable workspace of three groups of tetraplegics (NON-OP, operated group (OP) and tetraplegic control group (CON(Tetraplegic)) with varying levels of triceps function together with a healthy control group (CON(Healthy))) was defined by reaching to five target positions (anterior, medial, lateral, superior and inferior) located on the periphery of their workspace. Joint angles and inter-joint co-ordination were analysed after a 3D reconstruction of the thorax, humerus and forearm. The performance related variables of movement time, peak velocity, time-to-peak velocity and curvature index were also examined. RESULTS: The reachable volumes covered were consistent with the level of triceps function as CON(Healthy) covered a significantly greater volume than the tetraplegic groups and in turn the OP covered a larger workspace volume than NON-OP. The reduced workspace of tetraplegics was identified as being due to restrictions in workspace above shoulder height and across the body. Co-ordination data identified some differences in movement patterns but when reaching to targets on the workspace there were no significant differences between the OP and NON-OP groups. CONCLUSION: This study provided a detailed assessment of reachable workspace and target reaching. Tetraplegic participants found the superior and medial parts of the workspace were the most challenging directions. Standardised biomechanical analysis of tetraplegic upper-limb function is required for objective assessment.. |
[[#top|Back to Top]] | [[#top|Back to Top]] | ||
- | === Knee Biomechanics === | + | ==== Knee Biomechanics |
**Valldecabres R, de Benito AM, Littler G, Richards J. 2018.** | **Valldecabres R, de Benito AM, Littler G, Richards J. 2018.** | ||
Line 616: | Line 613: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]] | [[#top|Back to Top]] | ||
- | === Wrist Biomechanics === | + | ==== Wrist Biomechanics |
**Garg R, Kraszewski AP, Stoecklein HH, Syrkin G, Hillstrom HJ, Backus S, Lenhoff ML, Wolff AL, Crisco JJ, Wolfe SW. (2014)** | **Garg R, Kraszewski AP, Stoecklein HH, Syrkin G, Hillstrom HJ, Backus S, Lenhoff ML, Wolff AL, Crisco JJ, Wolfe SW. (2014)** | ||
Line 628: | Line 625: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]] | [[#top|Back to Top]] | ||
- | === Shoulder Biomechanics === | + | ==== Shoulder Biomechanics |
**Parel I, Cutti AG, Kraszewski A, Verni G, Hillstrom H, Kontaxis A. (2014)** | **Parel I, Cutti AG, Kraszewski A, Verni G, Hillstrom H, Kontaxis A. (2014)** | ||
Line 636: | Line 633: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]] | [[#top|Back to Top]] | ||
- | === Biofeedback === | + | ==== Biofeedback |
**Chan ZYSm Zhang JHW, Au IPH, An WW, Shum GLK, Ng GYF, Cheung RTH.** (2017). " | **Chan ZYSm Zhang JHW, Au IPH, An WW, Shum GLK, Ng GYF, Cheung RTH.** (2017). " | ||
// | // | ||
- | **Background**: | + | **Background**: |
- | \\ | + | |
**Taylor JB, Nguyen A, Paterno MV, Huang B and Ford KR.** " | **Taylor JB, Nguyen A, Paterno MV, Huang B and Ford KR.** " | ||
// | // | ||
- | **Background**: | + | **Background**: |
- | \\ | + | |
**Hafer JF, Brown AM, deMille P, Hillstrom HJ, Garber CE.** " | **Hafer JF, Brown AM, deMille P, Hillstrom HJ, Garber CE.** " | ||
// | // | ||
Many studies have documented the association between mechanical deviations from normal and the presence or risk of injury. Some runners attempt to change mechanics by increasing running cadence. Previous work documented that increasing running cadence reduces deviations in mechanics tied to injury. The long-term effect of a cadence retraining intervention on running mechanics and energy expenditure is unknown. This study aimed to determine if increasing running cadence by 10% decreases running efficiency and changes kinematics and kinetics to make them less similar to those associated with injury. Additionally, | Many studies have documented the association between mechanical deviations from normal and the presence or risk of injury. Some runners attempt to change mechanics by increasing running cadence. Previous work documented that increasing running cadence reduces deviations in mechanics tied to injury. The long-term effect of a cadence retraining intervention on running mechanics and energy expenditure is unknown. This study aimed to determine if increasing running cadence by 10% decreases running efficiency and changes kinematics and kinetics to make them less similar to those associated with injury. Additionally, | ||
- | \\ | ||
- | |||
- | \\ | ||
- | |||
**Teran-Yengle P, Birkhofer R, Weber MA, Patton K, Thatcher E, Yack HJ.** " | **Teran-Yengle P, Birkhofer R, Weber MA, Patton K, Thatcher E, Yack HJ.** " | ||
2011 - //J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.// | 2011 - //J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.// | ||
- | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of real-time biofeedback provided during treadmill gait training for correcting knee hyperextension in asymptomatic female while walking.\\ \\ BACKGROUND: | + | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of real-time biofeedback provided during treadmill gait training for correcting knee hyperextension in asymptomatic female while walking. BACKGROUND: |
[PMID: 22030469] | [PMID: 22030469] | ||
- | \\ | ||
- | \\ | ||
- | |||
**Zeni J, Abujaber S, Flowers, P, Possi F, Snyder-Mackler L** " | **Zeni J, Abujaber S, Flowers, P, Possi F, Snyder-Mackler L** " | ||
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013; | J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2013; | ||
- | STUDY DESIGN: Prospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort with an embedded comparison group at a single time point.\\ \\ OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of an outpatient rehabilitation protocol that includes movement symmetry biofeedback on functional and biomechanical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).\\ \\ BACKGROUND: TKA reduces pain and improves functional ability, but many patients experience strength deficits and movement abnormalities in the operated limb, despite outpatient rehabilitation. These asymmetries increase load on the nonoperated limb, and greater asymmetry is related to worse functional outcomes.\\ \\ METHODS: Biomechanical and functional metrics were assessed 2 to 3 weeks prior to TKA, at discharge from outpatient physical therapy, and 6 months after TKA in 11 patients (9 men, 2 women; mean SD age, 61.4 5.8 years; body mass index, 33.1 5.4 kg/m2) who received 6 to 8 weeks of outpatient physical therapy that included specialized symmetry training. Six-month outcomes were compared to a control group, matched by age, body mass index, and sex (9 men, 2 women; mean SD age, 61.8 5 years; body mass index, 34.3 5.1 kg/m2), that did not receive specialized symmetry retraining.\\ \\ RESULTS: Of the 11 patients who received added symmetry training, 9 demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements that exceeded the minimal detectable change for all performance-based functional tests at 6 months post-TKA compared to pre-TKA. Six months after TKA, when walking, patients who underwent symmetry retraining had greater knee extension during midstance and had mean sagittal knee moments that were more symmetrical, | + | STUDY DESIGN: Prospective analysis of a longitudinal cohort with an embedded comparison group at a single time point. OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of an outpatient rehabilitation protocol that includes movement symmetry biofeedback on functional and biomechanical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). BACKGROUND: TKA reduces pain and improves functional ability, but many patients experience strength deficits and movement abnormalities in the operated limb, despite outpatient rehabilitation. These asymmetries increase load on the nonoperated limb, and greater asymmetry is related to worse functional outcomes. METHODS: Biomechanical and functional metrics were assessed 2 to 3 weeks prior to TKA, at discharge from outpatient physical therapy, and 6 months after TKA in 11 patients (9 men, 2 women; mean SD age, 61.4 5.8 years; body mass index, 33.1 5.4 kg/m2) who received 6 to 8 weeks of outpatient physical therapy that included specialized symmetry training. Six-month outcomes were compared to a control group, matched by age, body mass index, and sex (9 men, 2 women; mean SD age, 61.8 5 years; body mass index, 34.3 5.1 kg/m2), that did not receive specialized symmetry retraining. RESULTS: Of the 11 patients who received added symmetry training, 9 demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements that exceeded the minimal detectable change for all performance-based functional tests at 6 months post-TKA compared to pre-TKA. Six months after TKA, when walking, patients who underwent symmetry retraining had greater knee extension during midstance and had mean sagittal knee moments that were more symmetrical, |
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | === Prosthetics === | + | ==== Prosthetics |
**Takahashi KZ and Stanhope SJ. (2013)** | **Takahashi KZ and Stanhope SJ. (2013)** | ||
Line 676: | Line 664: | ||
[[https:// | [[https:// | ||
Over the last half-century, | Over the last half-century, | ||
- | \\ | + | |
**Takahashi KZ, Kepple TM, Stanhope SJ. (2012)** | **Takahashi KZ, Kepple TM, Stanhope SJ. (2012)** | ||
A unified deformable (UD) segment model for quantifying total power of anatomical and prosthetic below-knee structures during stance in gait. | A unified deformable (UD) segment model for quantifying total power of anatomical and prosthetic below-knee structures during stance in gait. | ||
[[https:// | [[https:// | ||
Anatomically-relevant (AR) biomechanical models are traditionally used to quantify joint powers and segmental energies of lower extremity structures during gait. While AR models contain a series of rigid body segments linked together via mechanical joints, prosthetic below-knee structures are often deformable objects without a definable ankle joint. Consequently, | Anatomically-relevant (AR) biomechanical models are traditionally used to quantify joint powers and segmental energies of lower extremity structures during gait. While AR models contain a series of rigid body segments linked together via mechanical joints, prosthetic below-knee structures are often deformable objects without a definable ankle joint. Consequently, | ||
- | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | + | [[#top|Back to Top]] |
- | === Exoskeletons === | + | ==== Exoskeletons |
**Gordon KE and Ferris DP (2007)** | **Gordon KE and Ferris DP (2007)** | ||
Line 691: | Line 679: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | === Foot Biomechanics === | + | ==== Foot Biomechanics |
**Olsen MT, Bruening DA, Johnson AW, Ridge ST** (2019) | **Olsen MT, Bruening DA, Johnson AW, Ridge ST** (2019) | ||
Line 700: | Line 688: | ||
**Results: | **Results: | ||
**Conclusion: | **Conclusion: | ||
- | \\ | ||
- | |||
**Kelly LA, Farris DJ, Lichtwark GA, Cresswell AG (2017)** | **Kelly LA, Farris DJ, Lichtwark GA, Cresswell AG (2017)** | ||
Line 709: | Line 695: | ||
**Results**: | **Results**: | ||
**Conclusion**: | **Conclusion**: | ||
- | \\ | + | |
**D.W. Powell; B Williams, RJ Butler (2013)** | **D.W. Powell; B Williams, RJ Butler (2013)** | ||
A Comparison of Two Multisegment Foot Models in High and Low-Arched Athletes" | A Comparison of Two Multisegment Foot Models in High and Low-Arched Athletes" | ||
[[https:// | [[https:// | ||
- | **Background: | + | **Background: |
- | **Methods**: | + | |
- | **Results**: | + | |
- | **Conclusions: | + | |
- | \\ | + | |
**D.W. Powell; B Long, CE Milner, S Zhang (2011)** | **D.W. Powell; B Long, CE Milner, S Zhang (2011)** | ||
Frontal plane multi-segment foot kinematics in high- and low-arched females during dynamic loading tasks. Human Movement Science" | Frontal plane multi-segment foot kinematics in high- and low-arched females during dynamic loading tasks. Human Movement Science" | ||
Line 723: | Line 706: | ||
The functions of the medial longitudinal arch have been the focus of much research in recent years. Several studies have shown kinematic differences between high- and low-arched runners. No literature currently compares the inter-segmental foot motion of high and low-arched recreational athletes. The purpose of this study was to examine inter-segmental foot motion in the frontal plane during dynamic loading activities in high- and low-arched female athletes. Inter-segmental foot motions were examined in 10 highand 10 low-arched female recreational athletes. Subjects performed five barefooted trials in each of the following randomized movements: walking, running, downward stepping and landing. Three-dimensional kinematic data were recorded. High-arched athletes had smaller peak ankle eversion angles in walking, running and downward stepping than low-arched athletes. At the rear-midfoot joint high-arched athletes reached peak eversion later in walking and downward stepping than the low-arched athletes. The high-arched athletes had smaller peak mid-forefoot eversion angles in walking, running and downward stepping than the low-arched athletes. The current findings show that differences in foot kinematics between the high- and low-arched athletes were in position and not range of motion within the foot. | The functions of the medial longitudinal arch have been the focus of much research in recent years. Several studies have shown kinematic differences between high- and low-arched runners. No literature currently compares the inter-segmental foot motion of high and low-arched recreational athletes. The purpose of this study was to examine inter-segmental foot motion in the frontal plane during dynamic loading activities in high- and low-arched female athletes. Inter-segmental foot motions were examined in 10 highand 10 low-arched female recreational athletes. Subjects performed five barefooted trials in each of the following randomized movements: walking, running, downward stepping and landing. Three-dimensional kinematic data were recorded. High-arched athletes had smaller peak ankle eversion angles in walking, running and downward stepping than low-arched athletes. At the rear-midfoot joint high-arched athletes reached peak eversion later in walking and downward stepping than the low-arched athletes. The high-arched athletes had smaller peak mid-forefoot eversion angles in walking, running and downward stepping than the low-arched athletes. The current findings show that differences in foot kinematics between the high- and low-arched athletes were in position and not range of motion within the foot. | ||
- | \\ | ||
**J. Wilken, S Rao, C Saltzman, HJ Yack** " | **J. Wilken, S Rao, C Saltzman, HJ Yack** " | ||
2011 - //Clinical Biomechanics (26) 318-323.// | 2011 - //Clinical Biomechanics (26) 318-323.// | ||
The purpose of the current study was to assess kinematic coupling within the foot in individuals across a range of arch heights. Seventeen subjects participated in this study. Weight-bearing lateral radiographs were used to measure the arch height, defined as angle between the 1st metatarsal and the calcaneus. A kinematic model including the 1st metatarsal, lateral forefoot, calcaneus and tibia was used to assess foot kinematics during walking. Four coupling ratios were calculated: calcaneus frontal to forefoot transverse plane motion (Calcaneal EV/Forefoot AB), calcaneus frontal to transverse plane motion (Calcaneus EV/AB), forefoot sagittal to transverse plane motion (Forefoot DF/AB), and 1st metatarsal sagittal to transverse plane motion (1st Metatarsal DF/AB). Pearson product moment correlations were used to assess the relationship between arch height and coupling ratios. Mean (SD) radiographic arch angles of 129.8 (12.1) degrees with a range from 114 to 153 were noted, underscoring the range of arch heights in this cohort. Arch height explained approximately 3%, 38%, 12% and 1% of the variance in Calcaneal EV/Forefoot AB, Calcaneus EV/AB, Forefoot DF/AB and 1st Metatarsal DF/AB respectively. Calcaneal EV/Forefoot AB, Calcaneus EV/AB, Forefoot DF/AB and 1st Metatarsal DF/AB coupling ratios of 1.84±0.80, 0.56±0.35, 0.96±0.27 and 0.43±0.21were noted, consistent with the twisted foot plate model, windlass mechanism and midtarsal locking mechanisms. Arch height had a small and modest relationship with kinematic coupling ratios during walking. | The purpose of the current study was to assess kinematic coupling within the foot in individuals across a range of arch heights. Seventeen subjects participated in this study. Weight-bearing lateral radiographs were used to measure the arch height, defined as angle between the 1st metatarsal and the calcaneus. A kinematic model including the 1st metatarsal, lateral forefoot, calcaneus and tibia was used to assess foot kinematics during walking. Four coupling ratios were calculated: calcaneus frontal to forefoot transverse plane motion (Calcaneal EV/Forefoot AB), calcaneus frontal to transverse plane motion (Calcaneus EV/AB), forefoot sagittal to transverse plane motion (Forefoot DF/AB), and 1st metatarsal sagittal to transverse plane motion (1st Metatarsal DF/AB). Pearson product moment correlations were used to assess the relationship between arch height and coupling ratios. Mean (SD) radiographic arch angles of 129.8 (12.1) degrees with a range from 114 to 153 were noted, underscoring the range of arch heights in this cohort. Arch height explained approximately 3%, 38%, 12% and 1% of the variance in Calcaneal EV/Forefoot AB, Calcaneus EV/AB, Forefoot DF/AB and 1st Metatarsal DF/AB respectively. Calcaneal EV/Forefoot AB, Calcaneus EV/AB, Forefoot DF/AB and 1st Metatarsal DF/AB coupling ratios of 1.84±0.80, 0.56±0.35, 0.96±0.27 and 0.43±0.21were noted, consistent with the twisted foot plate model, windlass mechanism and midtarsal locking mechanisms. Arch height had a small and modest relationship with kinematic coupling ratios during walking. | ||
- | [PMID: Reference] | + | [PMID: Reference] |
- | \\ | + | |
**Milner CE, Hamill J, Davis IS** " | **Milner CE, Hamill J, Davis IS** " | ||
2010 - //J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Feb; | 2010 - //J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Feb; | ||
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional controlled laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the kinematics of the hip, knee, and rearfoot in the frontal and transverse planes in female distance runners with a history of tibial stress fracture. BACKGROUND: Tibial stress fractures are a common overuse injury in runners, accounting for up to half of all stress fractures. Abnormal kinematics of the lower extremity may contribute to abnormal musculoskeletal load distributions, | STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional controlled laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the kinematics of the hip, knee, and rearfoot in the frontal and transverse planes in female distance runners with a history of tibial stress fracture. BACKGROUND: Tibial stress fractures are a common overuse injury in runners, accounting for up to half of all stress fractures. Abnormal kinematics of the lower extremity may contribute to abnormal musculoskeletal load distributions, | ||
- | [PMID: 20118528 Reference] | + | [PMID: 20118528 Reference] |
- | \\ | + | |
**Pohl MB, Hamill J, Davis IS.** " | **Pohl MB, Hamill J, Davis IS.** " | ||
2009 - //Clin J Sport Med. 2009 Sep; | 2009 - //Clin J Sport Med. 2009 Sep; | ||
- | OBJECTIVE: To compare selected structural and biomechanical factors between female runners with a history of plantar fasciitis and healthy control subjects. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: University of Delaware Motion Analysis Laboratory, Newark, Delaware; and University of Massachusetts Biomechanics Laboratory, Amherst, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: | + | OBJECTIVE: To compare selected structural and biomechanical factors between female runners with a history of plantar fasciitis and healthy control subjects. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: University of Delaware Motion Analysis Laboratory, Newark, Delaware; and University of Massachusetts Biomechanics Laboratory, Amherst, Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: |
- | \\ | + | |
**Maclean CL, Davis IS, Hamill J.** " | **Maclean CL, Davis IS, Hamill J.** " | ||
2009 - //J Appl Biomech. 2009 Feb; | 2009 - //J Appl Biomech. 2009 Feb; | ||
- | The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of varying running shoe midsole composition on lower extremity dynamics with and without a custom foot orthotic intervention. Three-dimensional dynamics were collected on 12 female runners who had completed 6 weeks of custom foot orthotic therapy. Participants completed running trials in 3 running shoe midsole conditions-with and without a custom foot orthotic intervention. Results from the current study revealed that only maximum rearfoot eversion velocity was influenced by the midsole durometer of the shoe. Maximum rearfoot eversion velocity was significantly decreased for the hard shoe compared with the soft shoe. However, the orthotic intervention in the footwear led to significant decreases in several dynamic variables. The results suggest that the major component influencing the rearfoot dynamics was the orthotic device and not the shoe composition. In addition, data suggest that the foot orthoses appear to compensate for the lesser shoe stability enabling it to function in a way similar to that of a shoe of greater stability. | + | The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of varying running shoe midsole composition on lower extremity dynamics with and without a custom foot orthotic intervention. Three-dimensional dynamics were collected on 12 female runners who had completed 6 weeks of custom foot orthotic therapy. Participants completed running trials in 3 running shoe midsole conditions-with and without a custom foot orthotic intervention. Results from the current study revealed that only maximum rearfoot eversion velocity was influenced by the midsole durometer of the shoe. Maximum rearfoot eversion velocity was significantly decreased for the hard shoe compared with the soft shoe. However, the orthotic intervention in the footwear led to significant decreases in several dynamic variables. The results suggest that the major component influencing the rearfoot dynamics was the orthotic device and not the shoe composition. In addition, data suggest that the foot orthoses appear to compensate for the lesser shoe stability enabling it to function in a way similar to that of a shoe of greater stability. |
- | \\ | + | |
**MacLean C, McClay Davis I, and Hamill J** " | **MacLean C, McClay Davis I, and Hamill J** " | ||
2006 - //Clinical Biomechanics, | 2006 - //Clinical Biomechanics, | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Butler RJ, Davis IS, and Hamill J** " | **Butler RJ, Davis IS, and Hamill J** " | ||
2006 - //American Journal of Sports Medicine 34, 1998-2005// | 2006 - //American Journal of Sports Medicine 34, 1998-2005// | ||
- | BACKGROUND: Running shoes are designed to accommodate various arch types to reduce the risk of lower extremity injuries sustained during running. Yet little is known about the biomechanical changes of running in the recommended footwear that may allow for a reduction in injuries. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of motion control and cushion trainer shoes on running mechanics in low- and high-arched runners. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twenty high-arched and 20 low-arched recreational runners (>10 miles per week) were recruited for the study. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetics were collected as subjects ran at 3.5 ms(-1) +/- 5% along a 25-m runway. The motion control shoe evaluated was the New Balance 1122, and the cushioning shoe evaluated was the New Balance 1022. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to determine if low- and high-arched runners responded differently to motion control and cushion trainer shoes. RESULTS: A significant interaction was observed in the instantaneous loading rate such that the low-arched runners had a lower instantaneous loading rate in the motion control condition, and the high-arched runners had a lower instantaneous loading rate in the cushion trainer condition. Significant main effects for shoe were observed for peak positive tibial acceleration, | + | BACKGROUND: Running shoes are designed to accommodate various arch types to reduce the risk of lower extremity injuries sustained during running. Yet little is known about the biomechanical changes of running in the recommended footwear that may allow for a reduction in injuries. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of motion control and cushion trainer shoes on running mechanics in low- and high-arched runners. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twenty high-arched and 20 low-arched recreational runners (>10 miles per week) were recruited for the study. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetics were collected as subjects ran at 3.5 ms(-1) +/- 5% along a 25-m runway. The motion control shoe evaluated was the New Balance 1122, and the cushioning shoe evaluated was the New Balance 1022. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to determine if low- and high-arched runners responded differently to motion control and cushion trainer shoes. RESULTS: A significant interaction was observed in the instantaneous loading rate such that the low-arched runners had a lower instantaneous loading rate in the motion control condition, and the high-arched runners had a lower instantaneous loading rate in the cushion trainer condition. Significant main effects for shoe were observed for peak positive tibial acceleration, |
- | \\ | + | |
**Gordon KE, Sawicki GS and Ferris DP** " | **Gordon KE, Sawicki GS and Ferris DP** " | ||
2006 - //Journal of Biomechanics, | 2006 - //Journal of Biomechanics, | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Ferris DP, Bohra ZA, Lukos JR and Kinnaird CR** " | **Ferris DP, Bohra ZA, Lukos JR and Kinnaird CR** " | ||
2006 - //Journal of Applied Physiology, 100: | 2006 - //Journal of Applied Physiology, 100: | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Turner DE, Helliwell PS, Emery P, and Woodburn J** " | **Turner DE, Helliwell PS, Emery P, and Woodburn J** " | ||
Line 769: | Line 743: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]] | [[#top|Back to Top]] | ||
- | === Back or Spine === | + | ==== Back or Spine ==== |
**Seay J, Selbie WS, Hamill J.** " | **Seay J, Selbie WS, Hamill J.** " | ||
Line 777: | Line 751: | ||
**Mitchell K, Porter M, Anderson L, Phillips C, Arceo G, Montz B, Levy S, and Gombatto SP**(2017) " | **Mitchell K, Porter M, Anderson L, Phillips C, Arceo G, Montz B, Levy S, and Gombatto SP**(2017) " | ||
//BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2017) 18: | //BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders (2017) 18: | ||
- | Abstract\\ \\ Background: Low back pain (LBP) affects more than one third of the population at any given time, and chronic LBP is responsible for increased medical costs, functional limitations and decreased quality of life. A clear etiology is often difficult to identify, but aberrant posture and movement are considered contributing factors to chronic LBP that are addressed during physiotherapy intervention. Information about aberrant movement during functional activities in people with LBP can help inform more effective interventions. The purpose of this study was to determine if there are differences in lumbar spine and lower extremity kinematics in people with and without LBP during a step-up task.\\ \\ Methods: A convenience sample of 37 participants included 19 with LBP and 18 without a history of LBP. All participants were between the ages of 18 and 65, and controls were matched to participants with LBP based on age, gender and BMI. A motion capture system was used to record spine and lower extremity kinematics during the step-up task. ANOVA tests were used to determine differences in three-dimensional kinematics between groups.\\ \\ Results: Participants with LBP displayed less lower lumbar motion in the sagittal plane (P = 0.001), more knee motion in the coronal plane (P = 0.001), and more lower extremity motion in the axial plane (P = 0.002) than controls.\\ \\ Conclusions: | + | Abstract Background: Low back pain (LBP) affects more than one third of the population at any given time, and chronic LBP is responsible for increased medical costs, functional limitations and decreased quality of life. A clear etiology is often difficult to identify, but aberrant posture and movement are considered contributing factors to chronic LBP that are addressed during physiotherapy intervention. Information about aberrant movement during functional activities in people with LBP can help inform more effective interventions. The purpose of this study was to determine if there are differences in lumbar spine and lower extremity kinematics in people with and without LBP during a step-up task. Methods: A convenience sample of 37 participants included 19 with LBP and 18 without a history of LBP. All participants were between the ages of 18 and 65, and controls were matched to participants with LBP based on age, gender and BMI. A motion capture system was used to record spine and lower extremity kinematics during the step-up task. ANOVA tests were used to determine differences in three-dimensional kinematics between groups. Results: Participants with LBP displayed less lower lumbar motion in the sagittal plane (P = 0.001), more knee motion in the coronal plane (P = 0.001), and more lower extremity motion in the axial plane (P = 0.002) than controls. Conclusions: |
**D' | **D' | ||
2008 - //Spine Jun 6// PMID: | 2008 - //Spine Jun 6// PMID: | ||
- | STUDY DESIGN: An in vivo biomechanical study OBJECTIVE.: . The aim of the present study was to quantify and compare the reaction loads for two spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) procedures commonly used for low back pain using a biomechanical computer model.\\ \\ SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Contemporary computer-driven rigid linked-segment models (LSMs) have made it feasible to analyze low back kinetics and kinematics during various activities including spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) procedures. Currently, a comprehensive biomechanical model analyzing actual differences in loading effects between different SMT procedures is lacking.\\ \\ METHODS: Twenty-four healthy/ | + | STUDY DESIGN: An in vivo biomechanical study OBJECTIVE.: . The aim of the present study was to quantify and compare the reaction loads for two spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) procedures commonly used for low back pain using a biomechanical computer model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Contemporary computer-driven rigid linked-segment models (LSMs) have made it feasible to analyze low back kinetics and kinematics during various activities including spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) procedures. Currently, a comprehensive biomechanical model analyzing actual differences in loading effects between different SMT procedures is lacking. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy/ |
**Howarth SJ, D' | **Howarth SJ, D' | ||
2008 - //J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Mar-Apr; | 2008 - //J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Mar-Apr; | ||
- | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to present the experimental setup, the development, | + | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to present the experimental setup, the development, |
[[#top|Back to Top]] | [[#top|Back to Top]] | ||
- | === Gait === | + | ==== Gait ==== |
**Neckel ND, Blonien N, Nichols D, Hidler J** " | **Neckel ND, Blonien N, Nichols D, Hidler J** " | ||
2008 - //J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2008; 5: 19.// | 2008 - //J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2008; 5: 19.// | ||
BACKGROUND: It is well documented that individuals with chronic stroke often exhibit considerable gait impairments that significantly impact their quality of life. While stroke subjects often walk asymmetrically, | BACKGROUND: It is well documented that individuals with chronic stroke often exhibit considerable gait impairments that significantly impact their quality of life. While stroke subjects often walk asymmetrically, | ||
- | |[[http:// | + | |[[http:// |
- | \\ | + | |
**Keefer M, King J, Powell D, Krusenklaus JH, Zhang S** " | **Keefer M, King J, Powell D, Krusenklaus JH, Zhang S** " | ||
2008 - //Keefer, M, King, J, Powell, D, Krusenklaus, | 2008 - //Keefer, M, King, J, Powell, D, Krusenklaus, | ||
BACKGROUND: Although short-leg walkers are often used in the treatment of lower extremity injuries (ankle and foot fractures and severe ankle sprains), little is known about the effect the short-leg walker on gait characteristics. The purpose was to examine how heel height modifications in different short-leg walkers and shoe side may affect ground reaction forces in walking. METHODS: Force platforms were used to collect ground reaction force data on 10 healthy participants. Five trials were performed in each of six conditions: lab shoes, gait walker, gait walker with heel insert on shoe side, gait walker modified with insert on walker side, equalizer walker, and equalizer walker with heel insert on shoe side. Conditions were randomized and walking speed was standardized between conditions. A 2x6 (sidexcondition) repeated analysis of variance was used on selected ground reaction force variables (P< | BACKGROUND: Although short-leg walkers are often used in the treatment of lower extremity injuries (ankle and foot fractures and severe ankle sprains), little is known about the effect the short-leg walker on gait characteristics. The purpose was to examine how heel height modifications in different short-leg walkers and shoe side may affect ground reaction forces in walking. METHODS: Force platforms were used to collect ground reaction force data on 10 healthy participants. Five trials were performed in each of six conditions: lab shoes, gait walker, gait walker with heel insert on shoe side, gait walker modified with insert on walker side, equalizer walker, and equalizer walker with heel insert on shoe side. Conditions were randomized and walking speed was standardized between conditions. A 2x6 (sidexcondition) repeated analysis of variance was used on selected ground reaction force variables (P< | ||
- | [[http:// | + | [[http:// |
- | \\ | + | |
- | **Svehlika M, Slaby K, Soumar L, Smetanaa P, Kobesovac A, and Trca T**\\ \\ " | + | **Svehlika M, Slaby K, Soumar L, Smetanaa P, Kobesovac A, and Trca T** " |
2008 - //Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B 2008, 17: | 2008 - //Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B 2008, 17: | ||
- | Eleven patients with spastic cerebral palsy were evaluated preoperatively, | + | Eleven patients with spastic cerebral palsy were evaluated preoperatively, |
- | \\ | + | |
**Ramsey DK, Snyder-Mackler L, Lewek M, Newcomb W, Rudolph KS.** " | **Ramsey DK, Snyder-Mackler L, Lewek M, Newcomb W, Rudolph KS.** " | ||
2007 - //rthritis Care & Research. Volume 57, Issue 3 , Pages 389 - 397// | 2007 - //rthritis Care & Research. Volume 57, Issue 3 , Pages 389 - 397// | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Willems, Tine Mariek, Witvrouw, Erik, De Cock, Anneleen, De Clercq, Dirk** " | **Willems, Tine Mariek, Witvrouw, Erik, De Cock, Anneleen, De Clercq, Dirk** " | ||
2007 - //Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 39(2): | 2007 - //Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 39(2): | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Khan WS, Nokes L, Jones RK, Johnson DS** " | **Khan WS, Nokes L, Jones RK, Johnson DS** " | ||
- | 2007 - //Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 89-B, Issue 7, 911-914// | + | 2007 - //Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 89-B, Issue 7, 911-914// |
- | \\ | + | |
**Zhang, S, Clowers, KG, Powell, D.** " | **Zhang, S, Clowers, KG, Powell, D.** " | ||
2006 - //Zhang, S, Clowers, KG, Powell, D. Ground reaction force and 3D biomechanical characteristics of walking in short-leg walkers. Gait & Posture. 2006; 24(4): | 2006 - //Zhang, S, Clowers, KG, Powell, D. Ground reaction force and 3D biomechanical characteristics of walking in short-leg walkers. Gait & Posture. 2006; 24(4): | ||
Short-leg walking boots offer several advantages over traditional casts. However, their effects on ground reaction forces (GRF) and three-dimensional (3D) biomechanics are not fully understood. The purpose of the study was to examine 3D lower extremity kinematics and joint dynamics during walking in two different short-leg walking boots. Eleven (five females and six males) healthy subjects performed five level walking trials in each of three conditions: two testing boot conditions, Gait Walker (DeRoyal Industries, Inc.) and Equalizer (Royce Medical Co.), and one pair of laboratory shoes (Noveto, Adidas). A force platform and a 6-camera Vicon motion analysis system were used to collect GRFs and 3D kinematic data during the testing session. A one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate selected kinematic, GRF, and joint kinetic variables (p< | Short-leg walking boots offer several advantages over traditional casts. However, their effects on ground reaction forces (GRF) and three-dimensional (3D) biomechanics are not fully understood. The purpose of the study was to examine 3D lower extremity kinematics and joint dynamics during walking in two different short-leg walking boots. Eleven (five females and six males) healthy subjects performed five level walking trials in each of three conditions: two testing boot conditions, Gait Walker (DeRoyal Industries, Inc.) and Equalizer (Royce Medical Co.), and one pair of laboratory shoes (Noveto, Adidas). A force platform and a 6-camera Vicon motion analysis system were used to collect GRFs and 3D kinematic data during the testing session. A one-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to evaluate selected kinematic, GRF, and joint kinetic variables (p< | ||
- | [[http:// | + | [[http:// |
- | \\ | + | |
**Buczek F, Cooney K, Walker M, Rainbow M, Concha M, Sanders JO** " | **Buczek F, Cooney K, Walker M, Rainbow M, Concha M, Sanders JO** " | ||
2006 - //Clinical Biomechanics, | 2006 - //Clinical Biomechanics, | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Siegel KL, Kepple TM, Stanhope SJ** "A case study of gait compensations for hip muscle weakness in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy." | **Siegel KL, Kepple TM, Stanhope SJ** "A case study of gait compensations for hip muscle weakness in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy." | ||
- | 2007 - //Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007 Mar; | + | 2007 - //Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007 Mar; |
- | \\ | + | |
[[#top|Back to Top]] | [[#top|Back to Top]] | ||
- | === Osteoarthritis === | + | ==== Osteoarthritis |
**Hoglund LT1, Hillstrom HJ, Barr-Gillespie AE, Lockard MA, Barbe MF, Song J. (2014)** " | **Hoglund LT1, Hillstrom HJ, Barr-Gillespie AE, Lockard MA, Barbe MF, Song J. (2014)** " | ||
// | // | ||
- | Increased joint stress and malalignment are etiologic factors in osteoarthritis. Static tibiofemoral frontal plane malalignment is associated with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA). Patellofemoral joint stress is increased by activities such as sit-to-stand (STS); this stress may be even greater if dynamic frontal plane tibiofemoral malalignment occurs. If hip muscle or quadriceps weakness is present in persons with PFOA, aberrant tibiofemoral frontal plane movement may occur, with increased patellofemoral stress. No studies have investigated frontal plane tibiofemoral and hip kinematics during STS in persons with PFOA or the relationship of hip muscle and quadriceps strength to these motions. Eight PFOA and seven control subjects performed STS from a stool during three-dimensional motion capture. Hip muscle and quadriceps strength were measured as peak isometric force. The PFOA group demonstrated increased peak tibial abduction angles during STS, and decreased hip abductor, hip extensor, and quadriceps peak force versus controls. A moderate inverse relationship between peak tibial abduction angle and peak hip abductor force was present. No difference between groups was found for peak hip adduction angle or peak hip external rotator force. Dynamic tibiofemoral malalignment and proximal lower extremity weakness may cause increased patellofemoral stress and may contribute to PFOA incidence or progression. | + | Increased joint stress and malalignment are etiologic factors in osteoarthritis. Static tibiofemoral frontal plane malalignment is associated with patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA). Patellofemoral joint stress is increased by activities such as sit-to-stand (STS); this stress may be even greater if dynamic frontal plane tibiofemoral malalignment occurs. If hip muscle or quadriceps weakness is present in persons with PFOA, aberrant tibiofemoral frontal plane movement may occur, with increased patellofemoral stress. No studies have investigated frontal plane tibiofemoral and hip kinematics during STS in persons with PFOA or the relationship of hip muscle and quadriceps strength to these motions. Eight PFOA and seven control subjects performed STS from a stool during three-dimensional motion capture. Hip muscle and quadriceps strength were measured as peak isometric force. The PFOA group demonstrated increased peak tibial abduction angles during STS, and decreased hip abductor, hip extensor, and quadriceps peak force versus controls. A moderate inverse relationship between peak tibial abduction angle and peak hip abductor force was present. No difference between groups was found for peak hip adduction angle or peak hip external rotator force. Dynamic tibiofemoral malalignment and proximal lower extremity weakness may cause increased patellofemoral stress and may contribute to PFOA incidence or progression. |
- | \\ | + | |
**Barrios JA, Higginson JS, Royer TD, Davis IS.** " | **Barrios JA, Higginson JS, Royer TD, Davis IS.** " | ||
2009 - //Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Dec; | 2009 - //Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Dec; | ||
BACKGROUND: Individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis often present with varus knee alignment and ambulate with increased knee adduction moments. Understanding the factors that relate to the knee adduction moment in healthy individuals may provide insight into the development of this disease. Thus, this study aimed to examine the relationships of both static and dynamic lower extremity measures with the knee adduction moment. We hypothesized that the dynamic measures would be more closely related to this moment. METHODS: Arch height index, hip abduction strength and two static measures of knee alignment were recorded for 37 young asymptomatic knees that varied from normal to varus-aligned. Overground gait analyses were also performed. Correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationships between the static and dynamic variables to the knee adduction moment. Hierarchical regression analyses were then conducted using the static measures, the dynamic measures, and the static and dynamic measures together. RESULTS: Among the static measures, the tibial mechanical axis and the distance between the medial knee joint lines were correlated with the knee adduction moment. The best predictive static model (R(2)=0.53) included only the tibial mechanical axis. Among the dynamic variables, knee adduction and rearfoot eversion angles were correlated with the knee adduction moment. Knee adduction and rearfoot eversion, together, were the best dynamic model (R(2)=0.53). The static and dynamic measures together created the strongest of the three models (R(2)=0.59). CONCLUSIONS: | BACKGROUND: Individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis often present with varus knee alignment and ambulate with increased knee adduction moments. Understanding the factors that relate to the knee adduction moment in healthy individuals may provide insight into the development of this disease. Thus, this study aimed to examine the relationships of both static and dynamic lower extremity measures with the knee adduction moment. We hypothesized that the dynamic measures would be more closely related to this moment. METHODS: Arch height index, hip abduction strength and two static measures of knee alignment were recorded for 37 young asymptomatic knees that varied from normal to varus-aligned. Overground gait analyses were also performed. Correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationships between the static and dynamic variables to the knee adduction moment. Hierarchical regression analyses were then conducted using the static measures, the dynamic measures, and the static and dynamic measures together. RESULTS: Among the static measures, the tibial mechanical axis and the distance between the medial knee joint lines were correlated with the knee adduction moment. The best predictive static model (R(2)=0.53) included only the tibial mechanical axis. Among the dynamic variables, knee adduction and rearfoot eversion angles were correlated with the knee adduction moment. Knee adduction and rearfoot eversion, together, were the best dynamic model (R(2)=0.53). The static and dynamic measures together created the strongest of the three models (R(2)=0.59). CONCLUSIONS: | ||
- | [PMID: 19703728 Reference] | + | [PMID: 19703728 Reference] |
- | \\ | + | |
[[#top|Back to Top]] | [[#top|Back to Top]] | ||
- | === Stability === | + | ==== Stability |
**Apps C, Sterzing T, O’Brien T, Lake M(2016)** " | **Apps C, Sterzing T, O’Brien T, Lake M(2016)** " | ||
//Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 31 (2016) 55–62// | //Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 31 (2016) 55–62// | ||
- | Abstract: Unstable shoes (US) continually perturb gait which can train the lower limb musculature, | + | Abstract: Unstable shoes (US) continually perturb gait which can train the lower limb musculature, |
- | \\ | + | |
[[#top|Back to Top]] | [[#top|Back to Top]] | ||
- | === Obstacles === | + | ==== Obstacles |
**Schulz, B (2011)** " | **Schulz, B (2011)** " | ||
2007 - //Journal of Biomechanics 44 (2011) 1277–1284// | 2007 - //Journal of Biomechanics 44 (2011) 1277–1284// | ||
- | Abstract: Toe speed during gait generally nears its maximum while its height reaches a local minima approximately halfway through swing phase. Trips are thought to frequently occur at these local minima (minimum toe clearance or MTC events) and trip risk has been quantified using the minimum distance between the toe and ground here (MTC). This study investigated MTC on floor surfaces with and without multiple small obstacles. After shoes and floor surfaces were digitized, 14 unimpaired subjects (half women) each traversed a 4.88 m walkway 4 times at slow, preferred, and fast speeds across surfaces with no obstacles, visible obstacles, and hidden obstacles. Both surfaces with obstacles had the same random obstacle configuration. Shoe and body segment motions were tracked using passive markers and MTC and joint kinematics calculated. All MTC and kinematic variables tested significantly increased with faster instructed gait speed except the likelihood of MTC event occurrence (local minima in minimum toe clearance trajectory when foot is in upper quartile of speed). MTC events were less frequent for swing phases on surfaces with obstacles (80% vs. 98% for no obstacles). MTC values, when present, were doubled by the presence of visible obstacles (22.277.3 mm vs. 11.175.7 mm) and further increased to 26.877.1 mm when these obstacles were hidden from view (all comparisons pr0.0003). These substantial floor surface-related changes in MTC event occurrences and values resulted from alterations in toe- and heel-clearance trajectories caused by subtle but significant changes in joint kinematics that did not exceed 10% each joint’s swing phase range of motion. | + | Abstract: Toe speed during gait generally nears its maximum while its height reaches a local minima approximately halfway through swing phase. Trips are thought to frequently occur at these local minima (minimum toe clearance or MTC events) and trip risk has been quantified using the minimum distance between the toe and ground here (MTC). This study investigated MTC on floor surfaces with and without multiple small obstacles. After shoes and floor surfaces were digitized, 14 unimpaired subjects (half women) each traversed a 4.88 m walkway 4 times at slow, preferred, and fast speeds across surfaces with no obstacles, visible obstacles, and hidden obstacles. Both surfaces with obstacles had the same random obstacle configuration. Shoe and body segment motions were tracked using passive markers and MTC and joint kinematics calculated. All MTC and kinematic variables tested significantly increased with faster instructed gait speed except the likelihood of MTC event occurrence (local minima in minimum toe clearance trajectory when foot is in upper quartile of speed). MTC events were less frequent for swing phases on surfaces with obstacles (80% vs. 98% for no obstacles). MTC values, when present, were doubled by the presence of visible obstacles (22.277.3 mm vs. 11.175.7 mm) and further increased to 26.877.1 mm when these obstacles were hidden from view (all comparisons pr0.0003). These substantial floor surface-related changes in MTC event occurrences and values resulted from alterations in toe- and heel-clearance trajectories caused by subtle but significant changes in joint kinematics that did not exceed 10% each joint’s swing phase range of motion. |
- | \\ | + | |
**Enrique Pérez-Rizo, | **Enrique Pérez-Rizo, | ||
//Journal of Accessibility and Design for All(CC) JACCES, 2012 - 3(2): 127-148. ISSN: 2013-7087// | //Journal of Accessibility and Design for All(CC) JACCES, 2012 - 3(2): 127-148. ISSN: 2013-7087// | ||
- | Abstract: The goal of this study was to develop a three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic model of the right upper extremity and a Lofstrand crutch in order to analyze joint displacements and loads during crutch-assisted gait. A Lofstrand crutch was instrumented with a six-component load cell to measure forces and moments at the crutch tip. The crutch and the right upper extremity of a subject were instrumented with markers to obtain kinematic data. A biomechanical model based on rigid bodies was implemented in biomechanical analysis software. To demonstrate the functionality of the model, a pilot test was conducted on one healthy individual during Lofstrand crutch-assisted gait. The shoulder extended during the support phase and flexed in the swing phase, the elbow flexed during the swing, and the wrist remained in extension throughout the cycle. In the shoulder and elbow joints, the predominant reaction forces were upward, whereas the internal force moments were flexion and extension, respectively. This tool will be useful when it comes to identifying risk factors for joint pathology associated with pattern gait, aid design or crutch overuse. | + | Abstract: The goal of this study was to develop a three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic model of the right upper extremity and a Lofstrand crutch in order to analyze joint displacements and loads during crutch-assisted gait. A Lofstrand crutch was instrumented with a six-component load cell to measure forces and moments at the crutch tip. The crutch and the right upper extremity of a subject were instrumented with markers to obtain kinematic data. A biomechanical model based on rigid bodies was implemented in biomechanical analysis software. To demonstrate the functionality of the model, a pilot test was conducted on one healthy individual during Lofstrand crutch-assisted gait. The shoulder extended during the support phase and flexed in the swing phase, the elbow flexed during the swing, and the wrist remained in extension throughout the cycle. In the shoulder and elbow joints, the predominant reaction forces were upward, whereas the internal force moments were flexion and extension, respectively. This tool will be useful when it comes to identifying risk factors for joint pathology associated with pattern gait, aid design or crutch overuse. |
- | \\ | + | |
[[#top|Back to Top]] | [[#top|Back to Top]] | ||
- | === Other === | + | ==== Other ==== |
- | **Palmieri-Smith RM, Kreinbrink J, Ashton-Miller JA, and Wojtys EM**\\ \\ " | + | **Palmieri-Smith RM, Kreinbrink J, Ashton-Miller JA, and Wojtys EM** " |
2009 - //Journal of Athletic Training 2009; | 2009 - //Journal of Athletic Training 2009; | ||
CONTEXT: Sex differences in neuromuscular control of the lower extremity have been identified as a potential cause for the greater incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in female athletes compared with male athletes. Women tend to land in greater knee valgus with higher abduction loads than men. Because knee abduction loads increase ACL strain, the inability to minimize these loads may lead to ACL failure. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the activation patterns of the quadriceps and hamstrings muscles with respect to the peak knee abduction moment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Neuromuscular research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: | CONTEXT: Sex differences in neuromuscular control of the lower extremity have been identified as a potential cause for the greater incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in female athletes compared with male athletes. Women tend to land in greater knee valgus with higher abduction loads than men. Because knee abduction loads increase ACL strain, the inability to minimize these loads may lead to ACL failure. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the activation patterns of the quadriceps and hamstrings muscles with respect to the peak knee abduction moment. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Neuromuscular research laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: | ||
- | [[http:// | + | [[http:// |
- | \\ | + | |
**Drewniak E, Jay G, Fleming B, Crisco J** " | **Drewniak E, Jay G, Fleming B, Crisco J** " | ||
2009 - //Journal of Biomechanics, | 2009 - //Journal of Biomechanics, | ||
- | In attempts to better understand the etiology of osteoarthritis, | + | In attempts to better understand the etiology of osteoarthritis, |
- | \\ | + | |
**O' | **O' | ||
2009 - //Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise: April 2009 - Volume 41 - Issue 4 - pp 867-878// | 2009 - //Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise: April 2009 - Volume 41 - Issue 4 - pp 867-878// | ||
- | Purpose: The increased number of women participating in sports has led to a higher knee injury rate in women compared with men. Analysis of injury risk is limited to identification of discrete-dependent variables, but analysis of the entire waveform using principal components analysis (PCA) may provide greater insight. The purpose of this study was to examine gender differences in cutting knee mechanics using PCA and to compare these findings to those based on traditional discrete measures.\\ \\ Methods: Sixteen male and 17 female recreational athletes were recruited to perform unanticipated run and cutting tasks. Three-dimensional joint dynamics were recorded, and discrete variables were extracted. PCA analyses were also performed on the angle and moment waveforms in all three planes. The PCA used an eigenvalue analysis on the data covariance matrix. Gender differences in the principal component (PC) scores generated by the PCA were assessed using a MANOVA (P < 0.05).\\ \\ Results: On the basis of the discrete variables, flexion range of motion for females was less than for males. From the PCA analysis, females were less internally rotated during late stance and exhibited a relatively greater peak adduction moment that was not apparent in the original time series. This peak moment correlated with a greater abduction oscillation during early stance. There was also less variability for females in the sagittal and frontal plane moment PC.\\ \\ Conclusions: | + | Purpose: The increased number of women participating in sports has led to a higher knee injury rate in women compared with men. Analysis of injury risk is limited to identification of discrete-dependent variables, but analysis of the entire waveform using principal components analysis (PCA) may provide greater insight. The purpose of this study was to examine gender differences in cutting knee mechanics using PCA and to compare these findings to those based on traditional discrete measures. Methods: Sixteen male and 17 female recreational athletes were recruited to perform unanticipated run and cutting tasks. Three-dimensional joint dynamics were recorded, and discrete variables were extracted. PCA analyses were also performed on the angle and moment waveforms in all three planes. The PCA used an eigenvalue analysis on the data covariance matrix. Gender differences in the principal component (PC) scores generated by the PCA were assessed using a MANOVA (P < 0.05). Results: On the basis of the discrete variables, flexion range of motion for females was less than for males. From the PCA analysis, females were less internally rotated during late stance and exhibited a relatively greater peak adduction moment that was not apparent in the original time series. This peak moment correlated with a greater abduction oscillation during early stance. There was also less variability for females in the sagittal and frontal plane moment PC. Conclusions: |
- | \\ | + | |
**Schmitt LC, Rudolph KS** " | **Schmitt LC, Rudolph KS** " | ||
2008 - //Journal of Orthopaedic Research Journal of Orthopaedic Research Volume 26 Issue 9, Pages 1180 - 1185// | 2008 - //Journal of Orthopaedic Research Journal of Orthopaedic Research Volume 26 Issue 9, Pages 1180 - 1185// | ||
- | The sensation of knee instability (shifting, buckling. and giving way) is common in people with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). Its influence on knee stabilization strategies is unknown. This study investigated the influence of knee instability on muscle activation during walking when knee stability was challenged. Twenty people with medial knee OA participated and were grouped as OA Stable (OAS) (n = 10) and OA Unstable (OAU) (n = 10) based on self-reported knee instability during daily activities. Quadriceps strength, passive knee laxity, and varus alignment were assessed and related to knee instability and muscle cocontraction during walking when the support surface translated laterally. Few differences in knee joint kinematics between the groups were seen; however, there were pronounced differences in muscle activation. The OAU group used greater medial muscle cocontraction before, during, and following the lateral translation. Self-reported knee instability predicted medial muscle cocontraction, | + | The sensation of knee instability (shifting, buckling. and giving way) is common in people with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). Its influence on knee stabilization strategies is unknown. This study investigated the influence of knee instability on muscle activation during walking when knee stability was challenged. Twenty people with medial knee OA participated and were grouped as OA Stable (OAS) (n = 10) and OA Unstable (OAU) (n = 10) based on self-reported knee instability during daily activities. Quadriceps strength, passive knee laxity, and varus alignment were assessed and related to knee instability and muscle cocontraction during walking when the support surface translated laterally. Few differences in knee joint kinematics between the groups were seen; however, there were pronounced differences in muscle activation. The OAU group used greater medial muscle cocontraction before, during, and following the lateral translation. Self-reported knee instability predicted medial muscle cocontraction, |
- | \\ | + | |
**Goldberg EJ, Requejo PS, Fowler EG** " | **Goldberg EJ, Requejo PS, Fowler EG** " | ||
2008 - //Journal of Biomechanics 41 (2008) 695-800// | 2008 - //Journal of Biomechanics 41 (2008) 695-800// | ||
- | Joint reaction forces, moments and powers are important in interpreting gait mechanics and compensatory strategies used by patients\\ \\ walking with above-knee prostheses. Segmental anthropometrics, | + | Joint reaction forces, moments and powers are important in interpreting gait mechanics and compensatory strategies used by patients walking with above-knee prostheses. Segmental anthropometrics, |
- | \\ | + | |
**Farrokhi S, Pollard CD, Souza RB, Chen YJ, Reischl S, Powers CM.** " | **Farrokhi S, Pollard CD, Souza RB, Chen YJ, Reischl S, Powers CM.** " | ||
2008 - //J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Jul; | 2008 - //J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Jul; | ||
- | STUDY DESIGN: Experimental laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To examine how a change in trunk position influences the kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity of the lead lower extremity during the forward lunge exercise. BACKGROUND: Altering the position of the trunk during the forward lunge exercise is thought to affect the muscular actions of the lead lower extremity. However, no studies have compared the biomechanical differences between the traditional forward lunge and its variations. METHODS AND MEASURES: Ten healthy adults (5 males, 5 females; mean age +/- SD, 26.7 +/- 3.2 years) participated. Lower extremity kinematics, kinetics, and surface electromyographic (EMG) data were obtained while subjects performed 3 lunge exercises: normal lunge with the trunk erect (NL), lunge with the trunk forward (LTF), and lunge with trunk extension (LTE). A 1-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to compare lower extremity kinematics, joint impulse (area under the moment-time curve), and normalized EMG (highest 1-second window of activity for selected lower extremity muscles) among the 3 lunge conditions. RESULTS: During the LTF condition, significant increases were noted in peak hip flexion angle, hip extensor and ankle plantar flexor impulse, as well as gluteus maximus and biceps femoris EMG (P<.015) when compared to the NL condition. During the LTE condition, a significant increase was noted in peak ankle dorsiflexion and a significant decrease was noted in peak hip flexion angle (P<.015) compared to the NL condition. CONCLUSIONS: | + | STUDY DESIGN: Experimental laboratory study. OBJECTIVES: To examine how a change in trunk position influences the kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity of the lead lower extremity during the forward lunge exercise. BACKGROUND: Altering the position of the trunk during the forward lunge exercise is thought to affect the muscular actions of the lead lower extremity. However, no studies have compared the biomechanical differences between the traditional forward lunge and its variations. METHODS AND MEASURES: Ten healthy adults (5 males, 5 females; mean age +/- SD, 26.7 +/- 3.2 years) participated. Lower extremity kinematics, kinetics, and surface electromyographic (EMG) data were obtained while subjects performed 3 lunge exercises: normal lunge with the trunk erect (NL), lunge with the trunk forward (LTF), and lunge with trunk extension (LTE). A 1-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to compare lower extremity kinematics, joint impulse (area under the moment-time curve), and normalized EMG (highest 1-second window of activity for selected lower extremity muscles) among the 3 lunge conditions. RESULTS: During the LTF condition, significant increases were noted in peak hip flexion angle, hip extensor and ankle plantar flexor impulse, as well as gluteus maximus and biceps femoris EMG (P<.015) when compared to the NL condition. During the LTE condition, a significant increase was noted in peak ankle dorsiflexion and a significant decrease was noted in peak hip flexion angle (P<.015) compared to the NL condition. CONCLUSIONS: |
- | \\ | + | |
**Ramsey DK, Briem K, Axe MJ, and Snyder-Mackler L** "A Mechanical Theory for the Effectiveness of Bracing for Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis of the Knee." | **Ramsey DK, Briem K, Axe MJ, and Snyder-Mackler L** "A Mechanical Theory for the Effectiveness of Bracing for Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis of the Knee." | ||
2007 - //The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 89: | 2007 - //The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 89: | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Rudolph KS, Schmitt LC, and Lewek MD** " | **Rudolph KS, Schmitt LC, and Lewek MD** " | ||
2007 - //PHYS THER, Vol. 87, No. 11, 1422-1432// | 2007 - //PHYS THER, Vol. 87, No. 11, 1422-1432// | ||
- | Background and Purpose\\ \\ Aging is associated with musculoskeletal changes and altered walking patterns. These changes are common in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and may precipitate the development of OA. We examined age-related changes in musculoskeletal structures and walking patterns to better understand the relationship between aging and knee OA. Methods Forty-four individuals without OA (15 younger, 15 middle-aged, | + | Background and Purpose Aging is associated with musculoskeletal changes and altered walking patterns. These changes are common in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and may precipitate the development of OA. We examined age-related changes in musculoskeletal structures and walking patterns to better understand the relationship between aging and knee OA. Methods Forty-four individuals without OA (15 younger, 15 middle-aged, |
- | \\ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | \\ | + | |
**Tokuno CD, Carpenter MG, Thorstensson A, Garland SJ, and Cresswell AG** " | **Tokuno CD, Carpenter MG, Thorstensson A, Garland SJ, and Cresswell AG** " | ||
2007 - //Acta Physiologica, | 2007 - //Acta Physiologica, | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Segers V, Aerts P, Lenoir M, De Clercq, D** " | **Segers V, Aerts P, Lenoir M, De Clercq, D** " | ||
2007 - //Journal Exp Biol 310, 578-585// | 2007 - //Journal Exp Biol 310, 578-585// | ||
- | Judged by whole body dynamics, walking and running in humans clearly differ. When walking, potential and kinetic energy fluctuate out-of-phase and energy is partially recovered in a pendulum-like fashion. In contrast, running involves in-phase fluctuations of the mechanical energy components of the body centre of mass, allowing elastic energy recovery. We show that, when constantly accelerating across the transition speed, humans make the switch from walking to running abruptly in one single step. In this step, active mechanical energy input triples the normal step-by-step energy increment needed to power the imposed constant acceleration. This extra energy is needed to launch the body into the flight phase of the first running step and to bring the trunk into its more inclined orientation during running. Locomotor cycles immediately proceed with the typical in-phase fluctuations of kinetic and potential energy. As a result, the pendular energy transfer drops in one step from 43% to 5%. Kinematically, | + | Judged by whole body dynamics, walking and running in humans clearly differ. When walking, potential and kinetic energy fluctuate out-of-phase and energy is partially recovered in a pendulum-like fashion. In contrast, running involves in-phase fluctuations of the mechanical energy components of the body centre of mass, allowing elastic energy recovery. We show that, when constantly accelerating across the transition speed, humans make the switch from walking to running abruptly in one single step. In this step, active mechanical energy input triples the normal step-by-step energy increment needed to power the imposed constant acceleration. This extra energy is needed to launch the body into the flight phase of the first running step and to bring the trunk into its more inclined orientation during running. Locomotor cycles immediately proceed with the typical in-phase fluctuations of kinetic and potential energy. As a result, the pendular energy transfer drops in one step from 43% to 5%. Kinematically, |
- | \\ | + | |
**Ramsey DK, Snyder-Mackler L, Lewek M, Newcomb W, Rudolph KS.** " | **Ramsey DK, Snyder-Mackler L, Lewek M, Newcomb W, Rudolph KS.** " | ||
2007 - //rthritis Care & Research. Volume 57, Issue 3 , Pages 389 - 397// | 2007 - //rthritis Care & Research. Volume 57, Issue 3 , Pages 389 - 397// | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Willems, Tine Mariek, Witvrouw, Erik, De Cock, Anneleen, De Clercq, Dirk** " | **Willems, Tine Mariek, Witvrouw, Erik, De Cock, Anneleen, De Clercq, Dirk** " | ||
2007 - //Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 39(2): | 2007 - //Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 39(2): | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Domingo A, Sawicki GS, Ferris DP.** " | **Domingo A, Sawicki GS, Ferris DP.** " | ||
2007 - //Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 4: | 2007 - //Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation 4: | ||
- | Background\\ \\ Treadmill training with bodyweight support and manual assistance improves walking ability of patients with neurological injury. The purpose of this study was to determine how manual assistance changes muscle activation and kinematic patterns during treadmill training in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Methods\\ \\ We tested six volunteers with incomplete spinal cord injury and six volunteers with intact nervous systems. Subjects with spinal cord injury walked on a treadmill at six speeds (0.18–1.07 m/s) with body weight support with and without manual assistance. Healthy subjects walked at the same speeds only with body weight support. We measured electromyographic (EMG) and kinematics in the lower extremities and calculated EMG root mean square (RMS) amplitudes and joint excursions. We performed cross-correlation analyses to compare EMG and kinematic profiles. Results\\ \\ Normalized muscle activation amplitudes and profiles in subjects with spinal cord injury were similar for stepping with and without manual assistance (ANOVA, p > 0.05). Muscle activation amplitudes increased with increasing speed (ANOVA, p < 0.05). When comparing spinal cord injury subject EMG data to control subject EMG data, neither the condition with manual assistance nor the condition without manual assistance showed a greater similarity to the control subject data, except for vastus lateralis. The shape and timing of EMG patterns in subjects with spinal cord injury became less similar to controls at faster speeds, especially when walking without manual assistance (ANOVA, p < 0.05). There were no consistent changes in kinematic profiles across spinal cord injury subjects when they were given manual assistance. Knee joint excursion was ~5 degrees greater with manual assistance during swing (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Hip and ankle joint excursions were both ~3 degrees lower with manual assistance during stance (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Conclusion\\ \\ Providing manual assistance does not lower EMG amplitudes or alter muscle activation profiles in relatively higher functioning spinal cord injury subjects. One advantage of manual assistance is that it allows spinal cord injury subjects to walk at faster speeds than they could without assistance. Concerns that manual assistance will promote passivity in subjects are unsupported by our findings. | + | Background Treadmill training with bodyweight support and manual assistance improves walking ability of patients with neurological injury. The purpose of this study was to determine how manual assistance changes muscle activation and kinematic patterns during treadmill training in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Methods We tested six volunteers with incomplete spinal cord injury and six volunteers with intact nervous systems. Subjects with spinal cord injury walked on a treadmill at six speeds (0.18–1.07 m/s) with body weight support with and without manual assistance. Healthy subjects walked at the same speeds only with body weight support. We measured electromyographic (EMG) and kinematics in the lower extremities and calculated EMG root mean square (RMS) amplitudes and joint excursions. We performed cross-correlation analyses to compare EMG and kinematic profiles. Results Normalized muscle activation amplitudes and profiles in subjects with spinal cord injury were similar for stepping with and without manual assistance (ANOVA, p > 0.05). Muscle activation amplitudes increased with increasing speed (ANOVA, p < 0.05). When comparing spinal cord injury subject EMG data to control subject EMG data, neither the condition with manual assistance nor the condition without manual assistance showed a greater similarity to the control subject data, except for vastus lateralis. The shape and timing of EMG patterns in subjects with spinal cord injury became less similar to controls at faster speeds, especially when walking without manual assistance (ANOVA, p < 0.05). There were no consistent changes in kinematic profiles across spinal cord injury subjects when they were given manual assistance. Knee joint excursion was ~5 degrees greater with manual assistance during swing (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Hip and ankle joint excursions were both ~3 degrees lower with manual assistance during stance (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Conclusion Providing manual assistance does not lower EMG amplitudes or alter muscle activation profiles in relatively higher functioning spinal cord injury subjects. One advantage of manual assistance is that it allows spinal cord injury subjects to walk at faster speeds than they could without assistance. Concerns that manual assistance will promote passivity in subjects are unsupported by our findings. |
- | [[http:// | + | [[http:// |
- | \\ | + | |
**Gordon KE and Ferris DP** " | **Gordon KE and Ferris DP** " | ||
2007 - //Journal of Biomechanics, | 2007 - //Journal of Biomechanics, | ||
- | We used a lower limb robotic exoskeleton controlled by the wearer' | + | We used a lower limb robotic exoskeleton controlled by the wearer' |
- | \\ | + | |
**Palmieri-Smith RM, Kreinbrink J, Ashton-Miller JA, and Wojtys EM** " | **Palmieri-Smith RM, Kreinbrink J, Ashton-Miller JA, and Wojtys EM** " | ||
2007 - //Am J Sports Med. 35: 1269-1275// | 2007 - //Am J Sports Med. 35: 1269-1275// | ||
- | Background: Arthrogenic quadriceps muscle inhibition accompanies knee joint effusion and impedes rehabilitation after knee joint injury.\\ \\ Hypothesis: We hypothesized that an experimentally induced knee joint effusion would cause arthrogenic quadriceps muscle inhibition and lead to increased ground reaction forces, as well as sagittal plane knee angles and moments, during a single-legged drop landing.\\ \\ Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.\\ \\ Methods: Nine subjects (4 women and 5 men) underwent 4 conditions (no effusion, lidocaine injection, “low” effusion [30 mL], and “high” effusion [60 mL]) and then performed a single-legged drop landing. Lower extremity muscle activity, peak sagittal plane knee flexion angles, net sagittal plane knee moments, and peak ground reaction forces were measured.\\ \\ Results: Vastus medialis and lateralis activity were decreased during the low and high effusion conditions (P < .05). However, increases in peak ground reaction forces and decreases in peak knee flexion angle and net knee extension moments occurred only during the high effusion condition (P < .05).\\ \\ Conclusions: | + | Background: Arthrogenic quadriceps muscle inhibition accompanies knee joint effusion and impedes rehabilitation after knee joint injury. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that an experimentally induced knee joint effusion would cause arthrogenic quadriceps muscle inhibition and lead to increased ground reaction forces, as well as sagittal plane knee angles and moments, during a single-legged drop landing. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Nine subjects (4 women and 5 men) underwent 4 conditions (no effusion, lidocaine injection, “low” effusion [30 mL], and “high” effusion [60 mL]) and then performed a single-legged drop landing. Lower extremity muscle activity, peak sagittal plane knee flexion angles, net sagittal plane knee moments, and peak ground reaction forces were measured. Results: Vastus medialis and lateralis activity were decreased during the low and high effusion conditions (P < .05). However, increases in peak ground reaction forces and decreases in peak knee flexion angle and net knee extension moments occurred only during the high effusion condition (P < .05).Conclusions: |
- | \\ | + | |
**Myer GD, Ford F, Khoury J, Hewett TE** " | **Myer GD, Ford F, Khoury J, Hewett TE** " | ||
2007 - //Clinical Biomechanics 25 (2010) 693–699// | 2007 - //Clinical Biomechanics 25 (2010) 693–699// | ||
- | Background: Prospective measures of high knee abduction moment during landing identify female athletes at\\ \\ high risk for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury. Biomechanical laboratory measurements predict high knee abduction moment landing mechanics with high sensitivity (85%) and specificity (93%). The purpose of this study was to identify correlates to laboratory-based predictors of high knee abduction moment for use in a clinic-based anterior cruciate ligament injury risk prediction algorithm. The hypothesis was that clinically obtainable correlates derived from the highly predictive laboratory-based models would demonstrate high accuracy to determine high knee abduction moment status. Methods: Female basketball and soccer players (N=744) were tested for anthropometrics, | + | Background: Prospective measures of high knee abduction moment during landing identify female athletes at high risk for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury. Biomechanical laboratory measurements predict high knee abduction moment landing mechanics with high sensitivity (85%) and specificity (93%). The purpose of this study was to identify correlates to laboratory-based predictors of high knee abduction moment for use in a clinic-based anterior cruciate ligament injury risk prediction algorithm. The hypothesis was that clinically obtainable correlates derived from the highly predictive laboratory-based models would demonstrate high accuracy to determine high knee abduction moment status. Methods: Female basketball and soccer players (N=744) were tested for anthropometrics, |
- | \\ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | \\ | + | |
**Wheat JS, Vernon T, Milner CE** " | **Wheat JS, Vernon T, Milner CE** " | ||
- | 2007 - //ournal | + | 2007 - //Journal |
- | \\ | + | |
- | + | ||
- | \\ | + | |
**Khan WS, Nokes L, Jones RK, Johnson DS** " | **Khan WS, Nokes L, Jones RK, Johnson DS** " | ||
2007 - //Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 89-B, Issue 7, 911-914// | 2007 - //Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, Vol 89-B, Issue 7, 911-914// | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | |||
**Chow JY, Davids K, Button C, Koh M** " | **Chow JY, Davids K, Button C, Koh M** " | ||
2007 - //Journal of Motor Behavior, Volume 39, Number 6, 463 - 479// | 2007 - //Journal of Motor Behavior, Volume 39, Number 6, 463 - 479// | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Mizner RL, Snyder-Mackler L** " | **Mizner RL, Snyder-Mackler L** " | ||
2006 - //Journal of Orthopaedic Research Volume 23, Issue 5 , Pages 1083 - 1090// | 2006 - //Journal of Orthopaedic Research Volume 23, Issue 5 , Pages 1083 - 1090// | ||
- | Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) successfully reduces pain, but has not achieved comparable improvements in function. We hypothesized that quadriceps strength affects performance by altering loading and movement patterns during functional tasks. METHODS: Fourteen subjects with isolated, unilateral TKA were tested three months after surgery. Quadriceps strength was assessed isometrically and kinematics, kinetics, and EMG were collected during level walking and sit-to-stand (STS). Function was assessed using the timed up and go test (TUG), stair climbing test (SCT), and the 6 min walk test (6MW). RESULTS: Functional performance was significantly related to the quadriceps strength of both legs, but was more strongly related to the uninvolved strength (involved rho=-0.43 with TUG; -0.65 with SCT; 0.64 with 6MW) (uninvolved rho=-0.63 with TUG; -0.68 with SCT; 0.77 with 6MW). During STS, subjects shifted weight away from the operated limb | + | Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) successfully reduces pain, but has not achieved comparable improvements in function. We hypothesized that quadriceps strength affects performance by altering loading and movement patterns during functional tasks. METHODS: Fourteen subjects with isolated, unilateral TKA were tested three months after surgery. Quadriceps strength was assessed isometrically and kinematics, kinetics, and EMG were collected during level walking and sit-to-stand (STS). Function was assessed using the timed up and go test (TUG), stair climbing test (SCT), and the 6 min walk test (6MW). RESULTS: Functional performance was significantly related to the quadriceps strength of both legs, but was more strongly related to the uninvolved strength (involved rho=-0.43 with TUG; -0.65 with SCT; 0.64 with 6MW) (uninvolved rho=-0.63 with TUG; -0.68 with SCT; 0.77 with 6MW). During STS, subjects shifted weight away from the operated limb |
- | \\ | + | |
**Milner CE, Ferber R, Pollard CD, Hamill J, Davis IS** " | **Milner CE, Ferber R, Pollard CD, Hamill J, Davis IS** " | ||
2006 - //Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 323–328, 2006// | 2006 - //Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 323–328, 2006// | ||
- | MILNER, C. E., R. FERBER, C. D. POLLARD, J. HAMILL, and I. S. DAVIS. Biomechanical Factors Associated with Tibial Stress\\ \\ Fracture in Female Runners. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 323–328, 2006. Purpose: Tibial stress fractures (TSF) are among the most serious running injuries, typically requiring 6–8 wk for recovery. This cross-sectional study was conducted to determine whether differences in structure and running mechanics exist between trained distance runners with a history of prior TSF and those who have never sustained a fracture. Methods: Female runners with a rearfoot strike pattern, aged between 18 and 45 yr and running at least 32 kmIwkj1, were recruited for this study. Participants in the study were 20 subjects with a history of TSF and 20 ageand mileage-matched control subjects with no previous lower extremity bony injuries. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected during overground running at 3.7 mIsj1 using a six-camera motion capture system, force platform, and accelerometer. Variables of interest were vertical impact peak, instantaneous and average vertical loading rates, instantaneous and average loading rates during braking, knee flexion excursion, ankle and knee stiffness, and peak tibial shock. Tibial varum was measured in standing. Tibial area moment of inertia was calculated from tibial x-ray studies for a subset of runners. Results: The TSF group had significantly greater instantaneous and average vertical loading rates and tibial shock than the control group. The magnitude of tibial shock predicted group membership successfully in 70% of cases. Conclusion: These data indicate that a history of TSF in runners is associated with increases in dynamic loading-related variables. Key Words: GROUND REACTION FORCES, KINEMATICS, TIBIAL SHOCK,\\ \\ AREA MOMENT OF INERTIA | + | MILNER, C. E., R. FERBER, C. D. POLLARD, J. HAMILL, and I. S. DAVIS. Biomechanical Factors Associated with Tibial Stress Fracture in Female Runners. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 323–328, 2006. Purpose: Tibial stress fractures (TSF) are among the most serious running injuries, typically requiring 6–8 wk for recovery. This cross-sectional study was conducted to determine whether differences in structure and running mechanics exist between trained distance runners with a history of prior TSF and those who have never sustained a fracture. Methods: Female runners with a rearfoot strike pattern, aged between 18 and 45 yr and running at least 32 kmIwkj1, were recruited for this study. Participants in the study were 20 subjects with a history of TSF and 20 ageand mileage-matched control subjects with no previous lower extremity bony injuries. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected during overground running at 3.7 mIsj1 using a six-camera motion capture system, force platform, and accelerometer. Variables of interest were vertical impact peak, instantaneous and average vertical loading rates, instantaneous and average loading rates during braking, knee flexion excursion, ankle and knee stiffness, and peak tibial shock. Tibial varum was measured in standing. Tibial area moment of inertia was calculated from tibial x-ray studies for a subset of runners. Results: The TSF group had significantly greater instantaneous and average vertical loading rates and tibial shock than the control group. The magnitude of tibial shock predicted group membership successfully in 70% of cases. Conclusion: These data indicate that a history of TSF in runners is associated with increases in dynamic loading-related variables. Key Words: GROUND REACTION FORCES, KINEMATICS, TIBIAL SHOCK, AREA MOMENT OF INERTIA |
- | \\ | + | |
**MacLean C, McClay Davis I, and Hamill J** " | **MacLean C, McClay Davis I, and Hamill J** " | ||
2006 - //Clinical Biomechanics, | 2006 - //Clinical Biomechanics, | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Butler RJ, Davis IS, and Hamill J** " | **Butler RJ, Davis IS, and Hamill J** " | ||
2006 - //American Journal of Sports Medicine 34, 1998-2005// | 2006 - //American Journal of Sports Medicine 34, 1998-2005// | ||
- | BACKGROUND: Running shoes are designed to accommodate various arch types to reduce the risk of lower extremity injuries sustained during running. Yet little is known about the biomechanical changes of running in the recommended footwear that may allow for a reduction in injuries. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of motion control and cushion trainer shoes on running mechanics in low- and high-arched runners. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twenty high-arched and 20 low-arched recreational runners (>10 miles per week) were recruited for the study. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetics were collected as subjects ran at 3.5 ms(-1) +/- 5% along a 25-m runway. The motion control shoe evaluated was the New Balance 1122, and the cushioning shoe evaluated was the New Balance 1022. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to determine if low- and high-arched runners responded differently to motion control and cushion trainer shoes. RESULTS: A significant interaction was observed in the instantaneous loading rate such that the low-arched runners had a lower instantaneous loading rate in the motion control condition, and the high-arched runners had a lower instantaneous loading rate in the cushion trainer condition. Significant main effects for shoe were observed for peak positive tibial acceleration, | + | BACKGROUND: Running shoes are designed to accommodate various arch types to reduce the risk of lower extremity injuries sustained during running. Yet little is known about the biomechanical changes of running in the recommended footwear that may allow for a reduction in injuries. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of motion control and cushion trainer shoes on running mechanics in low- and high-arched runners. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twenty high-arched and 20 low-arched recreational runners (>10 miles per week) were recruited for the study. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetics were collected as subjects ran at 3.5 ms(-1) +/- 5% along a 25-m runway. The motion control shoe evaluated was the New Balance 1122, and the cushioning shoe evaluated was the New Balance 1022. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to determine if low- and high-arched runners responded differently to motion control and cushion trainer shoes. RESULTS: A significant interaction was observed in the instantaneous loading rate such that the low-arched runners had a lower instantaneous loading rate in the motion control condition, and the high-arched runners had a lower instantaneous loading rate in the cushion trainer condition. Significant main effects for shoe were observed for peak positive tibial acceleration, |
- | \\ | + | |
**Whatling GM, Holt CA, Jones L, Madete JK, Dabke H, Alderman PM and Roberts P** " | **Whatling GM, Holt CA, Jones L, Madete JK, Dabke H, Alderman PM and Roberts P** " | ||
2006 - //Ninth international symposium on teh 3D analysis of Human Movement// | 2006 - //Ninth international symposium on teh 3D analysis of Human Movement// | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Gordon KE, Sawicki GS and Ferris DP** " | **Gordon KE, Sawicki GS and Ferris DP** " | ||
2006 - //Journal of Biomechanics, | 2006 - //Journal of Biomechanics, | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Ferris DP, Bohra ZA, Lukos JR and Kinnaird CR** " | **Ferris DP, Bohra ZA, Lukos JR and Kinnaird CR** " | ||
2006 - //Journal of Applied Physiology, 100: | 2006 - //Journal of Applied Physiology, 100: | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Buczek F, Cooney K, Walker M, Rainbow M, Concha M, Sanders JO** " | **Buczek F, Cooney K, Walker M, Rainbow M, Concha M, Sanders JO** " | ||
2006 - //Clinical Biomechanics, | 2006 - //Clinical Biomechanics, | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Turner DE, Helliwell PS, Emery P, and Woodburn J** " | **Turner DE, Helliwell PS, Emery P, and Woodburn J** " | ||
2006 - //BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2006, 7:102// | 2006 - //BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2006, 7:102// | ||
[[http:// | [[http:// | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Stensdotter AK, Holmgren C, Dal?n T, H?ger-Ross C** " | **Stensdotter AK, Holmgren C, Dal?n T, H?ger-Ross C** " | ||
2006 - //Journal of Orthopaedic Research, Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 524 - 530// | 2006 - //Journal of Orthopaedic Research, Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 524 - 530// | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Turner DE, Davys HJ & Woodburn J** " | **Turner DE, Davys HJ & Woodburn J** " | ||
2005 - // | 2005 - // | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Goulermas JY, Howard D, Nester CJ, Jones RE, Ren L** " | **Goulermas JY, Howard D, Nester CJ, Jones RE, Ren L** " | ||
2005 - //Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, | 2005 - //Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Pollard CD, McClay Davis I, Hamill J** " | **Pollard CD, McClay Davis I, Hamill J** " | ||
2004 - //Clinical Biomechanics, | 2004 - //Clinical Biomechanics, | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Siegel, KL, Kepple, TM, & Stanhope SJ** " | **Siegel, KL, Kepple, TM, & Stanhope SJ** " | ||
2004 - //Gait and Posture, 19, 69-75// | 2004 - //Gait and Posture, 19, 69-75// | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Woodburn J, Nelson KM, Siegel KL, Kepple TM, Gerber LH** " | **Woodburn J, Nelson KM, Siegel KL, Kepple TM, Gerber LH** " | ||
2004 - //The Journal of Rheumatology 31: | 2004 - //The Journal of Rheumatology 31: | ||
- | OBJECTIVE: To test a multisegment foot model for kinematic analysis during barefoot walking in patients with well established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and foot impairments. METHODS: Five healthy adult subjects and 11 RA patients with advanced disease were studied. Foot impairments were assessed using standardized outcomes and clinical examination techniques. A 6-camera 60 Hz video-based motion analysis system was used to measure motion of the shank, rearfoot, forefoot, and hallux segments and the vertical displacement of the navicular. Face validity and estimates of repeatability were determined. Motion patterns were calculated and comparisons were made between healthy subjects and patients with RA. Relationships between clinical impairment and abnormal motion were determined through inspection of individual RA cases. RESULTS: Across the motion variables, the within-day and between-day coefficient of multiple correlation values ranged from 0.677 to 0.982 for the healthy subjects and 0.830 to 0.981 for RA patients. Based on previous studies, motion parameters for the healthy subjects showed excellent face validity. In RA patients, there was reduced range of motion across all segments and all planes of motion, which was consistent with joint stiffness. In the RA patients, rearfoot motion was shifted towards eversion and external rotation and peak values for these variables were increased, on average, by 7 degrees and 11 degrees, respectively. Forefoot range of motion was reduced in all 3 planes (between 31% and 53%), but the maximum and minimum angles were comparable to normal. The navicular height, during full foot contact, was on average 3 mm lower in the RA patients in comparison to normal. The hallux was less extended in the RA subjects in comparison to normal (21 degrees vs 33 degrees) during the terminal stance phase. Individual cases showed abnormal patterns of motion consistent with their clinical impairments, | + | OBJECTIVE: To test a multisegment foot model for kinematic analysis during barefoot walking in patients with well established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and foot impairments. METHODS: Five healthy adult subjects and 11 RA patients with advanced disease were studied. Foot impairments were assessed using standardized outcomes and clinical examination techniques. A 6-camera 60 Hz video-based motion analysis system was used to measure motion of the shank, rearfoot, forefoot, and hallux segments and the vertical displacement of the navicular. Face validity and estimates of repeatability were determined. Motion patterns were calculated and comparisons were made between healthy subjects and patients with RA. Relationships between clinical impairment and abnormal motion were determined through inspection of individual RA cases. RESULTS: Across the motion variables, the within-day and between-day coefficient of multiple correlation values ranged from 0.677 to 0.982 for the healthy subjects and 0.830 to 0.981 for RA patients. Based on previous studies, motion parameters for the healthy subjects showed excellent face validity. In RA patients, there was reduced range of motion across all segments and all planes of motion, which was consistent with joint stiffness. In the RA patients, rearfoot motion was shifted towards eversion and external rotation and peak values for these variables were increased, on average, by 7 degrees and 11 degrees, respectively. Forefoot range of motion was reduced in all 3 planes (between 31% and 53%), but the maximum and minimum angles were comparable to normal. The navicular height, during full foot contact, was on average 3 mm lower in the RA patients in comparison to normal. The hallux was less extended in the RA subjects in comparison to normal (21 degrees vs 33 degrees) during the terminal stance phase. Individual cases showed abnormal patterns of motion consistent with their clinical impairments, |
- | \\ | + | |
**Manal K, Stanhope SJ** "A novel method for displaying gait and clinical movement analysis data" | **Manal K, Stanhope SJ** "A novel method for displaying gait and clinical movement analysis data" | ||
2003 - //Gait and Posture, Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 222-226// | 2003 - //Gait and Posture, Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 222-226// | ||
- | Plotting kinematic and kinetic data of a patient’s movement patterns relative to normative values (i.e., mean and ±1 S.D.) is a common method used by clinicians to visually assess deviations and interpret the patient’s gait analysis data. This method of data interpretation is often time consuming and complex, especially when the process requires the inspection of a plethora of line graphs for numerous variables that are displayed across several report pages. In this paper we propose an alternate method for displaying movement pattern deviations relative to normative data by color-coding the magnitude and the direction of the deviation. An advantage of this approach is that a single page summary of all the deviation magnitudes can be displayed simultaneously, | + | Plotting kinematic and kinetic data of a patient’s movement patterns relative to normative values (i.e., mean and ±1 S.D.) is a common method used by clinicians to visually assess deviations and interpret the patient’s gait analysis data. This method of data interpretation is often time consuming and complex, especially when the process requires the inspection of a plethora of line graphs for numerous variables that are displayed across several report pages. In this paper we propose an alternate method for displaying movement pattern deviations relative to normative data by color-coding the magnitude and the direction of the deviation. An advantage of this approach is that a single page summary of all the deviation magnitudes can be displayed simultaneously, |
- | \\ | + | |
**Rudolf KS, Axe MJ, Buchanan TS, Scholz JP, Snyder-Mackler L** " | **Rudolf KS, Axe MJ, Buchanan TS, Scholz JP, Snyder-Mackler L** " | ||
2001 - //Knee Surg. Sprots Traumatol, Arthrosc 9: 62-71// | 2001 - //Knee Surg. Sprots Traumatol, Arthrosc 9: 62-71// | ||
- | Some individuals can stabilize their knees following anterior cruciate ligament rupture even during activities involving cutting and pivoting (copers), others have instability with daily activities (non-copers). Movement and muscle activation patterns of 11 copers, ten non-copers and ten uninjured subjects were studied during walking and jogging. Results indicate that distinct gait adaptations appeared primarily in the non-copers. Copers used joint ranges of motion, moments and muscle activation patterns similar to uninjured subjects. Non-copers reduced their knee motion, and external knee flexion moments that correlated well with quadriceps strength. Non-copers also achieved peak hamstring activity later in the weight acceptance phase and used a strategy involving more generalized co-contraction. Both copers and non-copers had high levels of quadriceps femoris muscle activity. The reduced knee moment in the involved limbs of the non-copers did not represent " | + | Some individuals can stabilize their knees following anterior cruciate ligament rupture even during activities involving cutting and pivoting (copers), others have instability with daily activities (non-copers). Movement and muscle activation patterns of 11 copers, ten non-copers and ten uninjured subjects were studied during walking and jogging. Results indicate that distinct gait adaptations appeared primarily in the non-copers. Copers used joint ranges of motion, moments and muscle activation patterns similar to uninjured subjects. Non-copers reduced their knee motion, and external knee flexion moments that correlated well with quadriceps strength. Non-copers also achieved peak hamstring activity later in the weight acceptance phase and used a strategy involving more generalized co-contraction. Both copers and non-copers had high levels of quadriceps femoris muscle activity. The reduced knee moment in the involved limbs of the non-copers did not represent " |
- | \\ | + | |
**Kepple TM, Stanhope SJ** " | **Kepple TM, Stanhope SJ** " | ||
2000 - //(Winters and Crago Editors)// | 2000 - //(Winters and Crago Editors)// | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Gatev P, Thomas S, Kepple TM, & Hallett M** " | **Gatev P, Thomas S, Kepple TM, & Hallett M** " | ||
1999 - //Journal of Physiology, | 1999 - //Journal of Physiology, | ||
- | 1. We studied quiet stance investigating strategies for maintaining balance. Normal subjects stood with natural stance and with feet together, with eyes open or closed. Kinematic, kinetic and EMG data were evaluated and cross-correlated.\\ \\ 2. Cross-correlation analysis revealed a high, positive, zero-phased correlation between anteroposterior motions of the centre of gravity (COG) and centre of pressure (COP), head and COG, and between linear motions of the shoulder and knee in both sagittal and frontal planes. There was a moderate, negative, zero-phased correlation between the anteroposterior motion of COP and ankle angular motion. 3. Narrow stance width increased ankle angular motion, hip angular motion, mediolateral sway of the COG, and the correlation between linear motions of the shoulder and knee in the frontal plane. Correlations between COG and COP and linear motions of the shoulder and knee in the sagittal plane were decreased. The correlation between the hip angular sway in the sagittal and frontal planes was dependent on interaction between support and vision. 4. Low, significant positive correlations with time lags of the maximum of cross-correlation of 250-300 ms were found between the EMG activity of the lateral gastrocnemius muscle and anteroposterior motions of the COG and COP during normal stance. Narrow stance width decreased both correlations whereas absence of vision increased the correlation with COP. 5. Ankle mechanisms dominate during normal stance especially in the sagittal plane. Narrow stance width decreased the role of the ankle and increased the role of hip mechanisms in the sagittal plane, while in the frontal plane both increased.\\ \\ 6. The modulation pattern of the lateral gastrocnemius muscle suggests a central program of control of the ankle joint stiffness working to predict the loading pattern. | + | 1. We studied quiet stance investigating strategies for maintaining balance. Normal subjects stood with natural stance and with feet together, with eyes open or closed. Kinematic, kinetic and EMG data were evaluated and cross-correlated. 2. Cross-correlation analysis revealed a high, positive, zero-phased correlation between anteroposterior motions of the centre of gravity (COG) and centre of pressure (COP), head and COG, and between linear motions of the shoulder and knee in both sagittal and frontal planes. There was a moderate, negative, zero-phased correlation between the anteroposterior motion of COP and ankle angular motion. 3. Narrow stance width increased ankle angular motion, hip angular motion, mediolateral sway of the COG, and the correlation between linear motions of the shoulder and knee in the frontal plane. Correlations between COG and COP and linear motions of the shoulder and knee in the sagittal plane were decreased. The correlation between the hip angular sway in the sagittal and frontal planes was dependent on interaction between support and vision. 4. Low, significant positive correlations with time lags of the maximum of cross-correlation of 250-300 ms were found between the EMG activity of the lateral gastrocnemius muscle and anteroposterior motions of the COG and COP during normal stance. Narrow stance width decreased both correlations whereas absence of vision increased the correlation with COP. 5. Ankle mechanisms dominate during normal stance especially in the sagittal plane. Narrow stance width decreased the role of the ankle and increased the role of hip mechanisms in the sagittal plane, while in the frontal plane both increased. 6. The modulation pattern of the lateral gastrocnemius muscle suggests a central program of control of the ankle joint stiffness working to predict the loading pattern. |
- | \\ | + | |
**Holden JP, Stanhope SJ.** " | **Holden JP, Stanhope SJ.** " | ||
1998 - //Gait and Posture 7, 1-6// | 1998 - //Gait and Posture 7, 1-6// | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Kepple, TMSiegel, KL, , & Stanhope SJ** " | **Kepple, TMSiegel, KL, , & Stanhope SJ** " | ||
1997 - //Gait and Posture, 6, 1-8// | 1997 - //Gait and Posture, 6, 1-8// | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Kepple, T. Siegel , K., & Stanhope, S.** " | **Kepple, T. Siegel , K., & Stanhope, S.** " | ||
1997 - //Gait and Posture, 5, 172-173// | 1997 - //Gait and Posture, 5, 172-173// | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Buczek FL, Kepple TM, Lohmann Siegel K., Stanhope SJ** " | **Buczek FL, Kepple TM, Lohmann Siegel K., Stanhope SJ** " | ||
1994 - // | 1994 - // | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Buczek F., Siegel K., Kepple T., Stanhope S.** " | **Buczek F., Siegel K., Kepple T., Stanhope S.** " | ||
1991 - // | 1991 - // | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Kepple T.** " | **Kepple T.** " | ||
1991 - //IEEE 1991 Future Directions Workshop, 106-109// | 1991 - //IEEE 1991 Future Directions Workshop, 106-109// | ||
- | \\ | + | |
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | ==== Sports ==== | + | ===== Sports |
\\ | \\ | ||
- | === Gymnastics === | + | ==== Gymnastics |
\\ | \\ | ||
**Farana R, Irwin G, Jandacka D, Uchytil J, Mullineaux DR(2015)** " | **Farana R, Irwin G, Jandacka D, Uchytil J, Mullineaux DR(2015)** " | ||
// | // | ||
- | The aim of the present study was to conduct within-gymnast analyses\\ \\ of biological movement variability in impact forces, elbow joint kinematics and kinetics of expert gymnasts in the execution of the round-off with different hand positions. Six international level female gymnasts performed 10 trials of the round-off from a hurdle step to a back-handspring using two hand potions: parallel and Tshape. Two force plates were used to determine ground reaction forces. Eight infrared cameras were employed to collect the kinematic data automatically.Within gymnast variability was calculated using biological coefficient of variation (BCV) discretely for ground reaction force, kinematic and kinetic measures. Variability of the continuous data was quantified using coefficient of multiple correlations (CMC). Group BCV and CMC were calculated and T-test with effect size statistics determined differences between the variability of the two techniques examined in this study. Themajor observation\\ \\ was a higher level of biological variability in the elbow joint abduction angle and adduction moment of force in the T-shaped hand position. This finding may lead to a reduced repetitive abduction stress and thus protect the elbow joint from overload. Knowledge of the differences in biological variability can inform clinicians and practitioners with effective skill selection. | + | The aim of the present study was to conduct within-gymnast analyses of biological movement variability in impact forces, elbow joint kinematics and kinetics of expert gymnasts in the execution of the round-off with different hand positions. Six international level female gymnasts performed 10 trials of the round-off from a hurdle step to a back-handspring using two hand potions: parallel and Tshape. Two force plates were used to determine ground reaction forces. Eight infrared cameras were employed to collect the kinematic data automatically.Within gymnast variability was calculated using biological coefficient of variation (BCV) discretely for ground reaction force, kinematic and kinetic measures. Variability of the continuous data was quantified using coefficient of multiple correlations (CMC). Group BCV and CMC were calculated and T-test with effect size statistics determined differences between the variability of the two techniques examined in this study. Themajor observation was a higher level of biological variability in the elbow joint abduction angle and adduction moment of force in the T-shaped hand position. This finding may lead to a reduced repetitive abduction stress and thus protect the elbow joint from overload. Knowledge of the differences in biological variability can inform clinicians and practitioners with effective skill selection. |
Farana, R., Jandacka, D., & Irwin, G. (2013). Influence of different hand positions on impact forces and elbow loading during the round off in gymnastics: A case study. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 5, 5–14. | Farana, R., Jandacka, D., & Irwin, G. (2013). Influence of different hand positions on impact forces and elbow loading during the round off in gymnastics: A case study. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 5, 5–14. | ||
- | |||
- | \\ | ||
**Farana, R., Jandacka, D., Irwin, G. (2013)** " | **Farana, R., Jandacka, D., Irwin, G. (2013)** " | ||
Line 1100: | Line 1006: | ||
The round-off is a fundamental gymnastics skill and a key movement in the development of elite female gymnasts. The aim of this study was to determine whether differences in hand position during the round-off may influence the ground reaction forces and elbow joint moments in female artistic gymnastics. One international level active female gymnast from the Czech Republic participated in this study. Two force plates were used to determine ground reaction forces. A motion-capture system consisting of eight infrared cameras were employed to collect the kinematic data. The gymnast performed 10 trials of a round-off from a hurdle step to back handspring with a “parallel” hand position and 10 trials with a “T” shape hand position. Effect size statistics were used to establish differences in means. In conclusion “T” position of the second hand reduces vertical and anterior-posterior ground reaction forces. Differences in joint elbow moments and elbow kinematics indicated that the “T” position may prevent elbow joint complex and reduces potential of elbow injuries. | The round-off is a fundamental gymnastics skill and a key movement in the development of elite female gymnasts. The aim of this study was to determine whether differences in hand position during the round-off may influence the ground reaction forces and elbow joint moments in female artistic gymnastics. One international level active female gymnast from the Czech Republic participated in this study. Two force plates were used to determine ground reaction forces. A motion-capture system consisting of eight infrared cameras were employed to collect the kinematic data. The gymnast performed 10 trials of a round-off from a hurdle step to back handspring with a “parallel” hand position and 10 trials with a “T” shape hand position. Effect size statistics were used to establish differences in means. In conclusion “T” position of the second hand reduces vertical and anterior-posterior ground reaction forces. Differences in joint elbow moments and elbow kinematics indicated that the “T” position may prevent elbow joint complex and reduces potential of elbow injuries. | ||
- | \\ | + | **Farana, R., Jandacka, D., Uchytil, J., Zahradnik, D., & Irwin, G. (2014)** " |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | **Farana, R., Jandacka, D., Uchytil, J., Zahradnik, D., & Irwin, G. (2014)**\\ \\ " | + | |
// | // | ||
Chronic elbow injuries from tumbling in female gymnastics present a serious problem for performers. This research examined how the biomechanical characteristics of impact loading and elbow kinematics and kinetics change as a function of technique selection. Seven international-level female gymnasts performed 10 trials of the round-off from a hurdle step to flic-flac with ' | Chronic elbow injuries from tumbling in female gymnastics present a serious problem for performers. This research examined how the biomechanical characteristics of impact loading and elbow kinematics and kinetics change as a function of technique selection. Seven international-level female gymnasts performed 10 trials of the round-off from a hurdle step to flic-flac with ' | ||
- | \\ | + | |
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | === Baseball === | + | ==== Baseball |
- | \\ | + | |
**Buffi JH1, Werner K, Kepple T, Murray WM. (2014)** " | **Buffi JH1, Werner K, Kepple T, Murray WM. (2014)** " | ||
// | // | ||
Baseball pitching imposes a dangerous valgus load on the elbow that puts the joint at severe risk for injury. The goal of this study was to develop a musculoskeletal modeling approach to enable evaluation of muscle-tendon contributions to mitigating elbow injury risk in pitching. We implemented a forward dynamic simulation framework that used a scaled biomechanical model to reproduce a pitching motion recorded from a high school pitcher. The medial elbow muscles generated substantial, | Baseball pitching imposes a dangerous valgus load on the elbow that puts the joint at severe risk for injury. The goal of this study was to develop a musculoskeletal modeling approach to enable evaluation of muscle-tendon contributions to mitigating elbow injury risk in pitching. We implemented a forward dynamic simulation framework that used a scaled biomechanical model to reproduce a pitching motion recorded from a high school pitcher. The medial elbow muscles generated substantial, | ||
- | \\ | + | |
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | === Swimming === | + | ==== Swimming |
\\ | \\ | ||
**Soltania P, Figueiredo P, Fernandesa RJ, Vilas-Boasa JP. (2017)** " | **Soltania P, Figueiredo P, Fernandesa RJ, Vilas-Boasa JP. (2017)** " | ||
Line 1125: | Line 1028: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | === Golf === | + | ==== Golf ==== |
\\ | \\ | ||
- | **Susan J. Brown, Alan M. Nevill, Stuart A. Monk, Steve R. Otto, W. Scott Selbie & Eric S. Wallace**\\ \\ ****\\ \\ " | + | **Susan J. Brown, Alan M. Nevill, Stuart A. Monk, Steve R. Otto, W. Scott Selbie & Eric S. Wallace** " |
2008 - //J Sports Sci. 2011 Oct 11.// | 2008 - //J Sports Sci. 2011 Oct 11.// | ||
Previous studies on the kinematics of the golf swing have mainly focused on group analysis of male golfers of a wide ability range. In the present study, we investigated gross body kinematics using a novel method of analysis for golf research for a group of low handicap female golfers to provide an understanding of their swing mechanics in relation to performance. Data were collected for the drive swings of 16 golfers using a 12-camera three-dimensional motion capture system and a stereoscopic launch monitor. Analysis of covariance identified three covariates (increased pelvis–thorax differential at the top of the backswing, increased pelvis translation during the backswing, and a decrease in absolute backswing time) as determinants of the variance in clubhead speed (adjusted r 2 = 0.965, P < 0.05). A significant correlation was found between left-hand grip strength and clubhead speed (r = 0.54, P < 0.05) and between handicap and clubhead speed (r = −0.612, P < 0.05). Flexibility measures showed some correlation with clubhead speed; both sitting flexibility tests gave positive correlations (clockwise: r = 0.522, P < 0.05; counterclockwise: | Previous studies on the kinematics of the golf swing have mainly focused on group analysis of male golfers of a wide ability range. In the present study, we investigated gross body kinematics using a novel method of analysis for golf research for a group of low handicap female golfers to provide an understanding of their swing mechanics in relation to performance. Data were collected for the drive swings of 16 golfers using a 12-camera three-dimensional motion capture system and a stereoscopic launch monitor. Analysis of covariance identified three covariates (increased pelvis–thorax differential at the top of the backswing, increased pelvis translation during the backswing, and a decrease in absolute backswing time) as determinants of the variance in clubhead speed (adjusted r 2 = 0.965, P < 0.05). A significant correlation was found between left-hand grip strength and clubhead speed (r = 0.54, P < 0.05) and between handicap and clubhead speed (r = −0.612, P < 0.05). Flexibility measures showed some correlation with clubhead speed; both sitting flexibility tests gave positive correlations (clockwise: r = 0.522, P < 0.05; counterclockwise: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | **Susan J. Brown, W. Scott Selbie & Eric S. Wallace**\\ \\ ****\\ \\ " | + | **Susan J. Brown, W. Scott Selbie & Eric S. Wallace** " |
2013 - //J Sports Sci. (in press).// | 2013 - //J Sports Sci. (in press).// | ||
A common biomechanical feature of a golf swing, described in various ways in the literature, is the interaction between the thorax and pelvis, often termed the X-Factor. There is no consistent method used within golf biomechanics literature however to calculate these segment interactions. The purpose of this study was to examine data calculated using three reported methods of the X-Factor in order to determine the similarity or otherwise of the data calculated using each method. A twelve camera three-dimensional motion capture system was used to capture the driver swings of 19 participants and a subject specific three-dimensional biomechanical model was created with the position and orientation of each model estimated using a global optimization algorithm. Comparison of the X-Factor methods showed significant differences for events during the swing (p< | A common biomechanical feature of a golf swing, described in various ways in the literature, is the interaction between the thorax and pelvis, often termed the X-Factor. There is no consistent method used within golf biomechanics literature however to calculate these segment interactions. The purpose of this study was to examine data calculated using three reported methods of the X-Factor in order to determine the similarity or otherwise of the data calculated using each method. A twelve camera three-dimensional motion capture system was used to capture the driver swings of 19 participants and a subject specific three-dimensional biomechanical model was created with the position and orientation of each model estimated using a global optimization algorithm. Comparison of the X-Factor methods showed significant differences for events during the swing (p< | ||
Line 1137: | Line 1040: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | === Netball === | + | ==== Netball |
\\ | \\ | ||
**Delextrat A, Goss-Sampson M.** " | **Delextrat A, Goss-Sampson M.** " | ||
Line 1145: | Line 1048: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | === Football/ | + | ==== Football/ |
\\ | \\ | ||
**Jones, P. L., Kerwin, D. G., Irwin, G. and Nokes, Leonard.** " | **Jones, P. L., Kerwin, D. G., Irwin, G. and Nokes, Leonard.** " | ||
Line 1153: | Line 1056: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | ==== OpenSim ==== | + | ===== OpenSim |
**Lewis CL, Garibay EJ. (2014)** " | **Lewis CL, Garibay EJ. (2014)** " | ||
Line 1162: | Line 1065: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | ==== Running ==== | + | ===== Running |
**Gill N, Preece SJ, Young S, Bramah C.** " | **Gill N, Preece SJ, Young S, Bramah C.** " | ||
2017 - //Gait & Posture 51 (2017) 281–283// | 2017 - //Gait & Posture 51 (2017) 281–283// | ||
Accurate measurement of centre of mass (CoM) motion can provide valuable insight into the biomechanics of human running. However, full-body kinematic measurement protocols can be time consuming and difficult to implement. Therefore, this study was performed to understand whether CoM motion during running could be estimated from a model incorporating only lower extremity, pelvic and trunk segments. Full-body kinematic data was collected whilst (n = 12) participants ran on a treadmill at two speeds (3.1 and 3.9 ms�1). CoM trajectories from a full-body model (16-segments) were compared to those estimated from a reduced model (excluding the head and arms). The data showed that, provided an offset was included, it was possible to accurately estimate CoM trajectory in both the anterior-posterior and vertical direction, with root mean square errors of 5 mm in both directions and close matches in waveform similarity (r = 0.975-1.000). However, in the ML direction, there was a considerable difference in the CoM trajectories of the two models (r = 0.774–0.767). This finding suggests that a full-body model is required if CoM motions are to be measured in the ML direction. The mismatch between the reduced and full-body model highlights the important contribution of the arms to CoM motion in the ML direction. We suggest that this control strategy, of using the arms rather than the heavier trunk segments to generate CoM motion, may lead to less variability in CoM motion in the ML direction and subsequently less variability in step width during human running. | Accurate measurement of centre of mass (CoM) motion can provide valuable insight into the biomechanics of human running. However, full-body kinematic measurement protocols can be time consuming and difficult to implement. Therefore, this study was performed to understand whether CoM motion during running could be estimated from a model incorporating only lower extremity, pelvic and trunk segments. Full-body kinematic data was collected whilst (n = 12) participants ran on a treadmill at two speeds (3.1 and 3.9 ms�1). CoM trajectories from a full-body model (16-segments) were compared to those estimated from a reduced model (excluding the head and arms). The data showed that, provided an offset was included, it was possible to accurately estimate CoM trajectory in both the anterior-posterior and vertical direction, with root mean square errors of 5 mm in both directions and close matches in waveform similarity (r = 0.975-1.000). However, in the ML direction, there was a considerable difference in the CoM trajectories of the two models (r = 0.774–0.767). This finding suggests that a full-body model is required if CoM motions are to be measured in the ML direction. The mismatch between the reduced and full-body model highlights the important contribution of the arms to CoM motion in the ML direction. We suggest that this control strategy, of using the arms rather than the heavier trunk segments to generate CoM motion, may lead to less variability in CoM motion in the ML direction and subsequently less variability in step width during human running. | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Willy RW, Manal KT, Witvrouw EE, Davis IS..** " | **Willy RW, Manal KT, Witvrouw EE, Davis IS..** " | ||
2014 - //Br J Sports Med. Apr; | 2014 - //Br J Sports Med. Apr; | ||
- | INTRODUCTION: | + | INTRODUCTION: |
- | \\ | + | |
**Alenezi F, Herrington L, Jones P, Jones R.** " | **Alenezi F, Herrington L, Jones P, Jones R.** " | ||
2014 - //Br J Sports Med. Apr; | 2014 - //Br J Sports Med. Apr; | ||
- | BACKGROUND:\\ \\ The need to develop screening tests to find athletes who maybe predisposed to knee injuries is of prime importance in order to design individualised intervention programmes. Previous research has found 3D joint kinematics of the hip and knee during a single leg squat (SLS) to be related to those during jogging (Whatman et al., 2011). Thus, further investigation as a potential screening test is warranted. OBJECTIVE:\\ \\ To investigate the relationship between peak 3D kinematic variables during SLS with those occurring during running (RUN) and 90° cutting (CUT) tasks.\\ \\ DESIGN: A correlational study.\\ \\ SETTING: Undertaken in the human performance laboratory at the University of Salford.\\ \\ PARTICIPANTS: | + | BACKGROUND: The need to develop screening tests to find athletes who maybe predisposed to knee injuries is of prime importance in order to design individualised intervention programmes. Previous research has found 3D joint kinematics of the hip and knee during a single leg squat (SLS) to be related to those during jogging (Whatman et al., 2011). Thus, further investigation as a potential screening test is warranted. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between peak 3D kinematic variables during SLS with those occurring during running (RUN) and 90° cutting (CUT) tasks. DESIGN: A correlational study. SETTING: Undertaken in the human performance laboratory at the University of Salford. PARTICIPANTS: |
- | \\ | + | |
**McClay I, Manal K** " | **McClay I, Manal K** " | ||
1999 - //Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 31: | 1999 - //Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 31: | ||
PURPOSE: The study of angular kinetic data provides important information regarding muscle function and may lend insight into the etiology of overuse injuries common to runners. These injuries are often due to deviations in the secondary planes of motion. However, little is known about the angular kinetics in these planes leaving no reference for comparison. METHODS: Therefore, three-dimensional kinematic and ground reaction force data were collected on 20 recreational runners with normal rearfoot mechanics. RESULTS: Findings suggest that sagittal plane kinetic data were similar to the two-dimensional studies reported in the literature. Sagittal plane data were least variable (CV: 9.3-11.0%) and comprised the largest percentage of positive or negative work done (80.2-88.8%) at both the rearfoot and knee joints. Transverse plane kinetics were most variable (CV: 68.5-151.9%) and constituted the smallest percentage of work done at both joints (0.7-7.4%). CONCLUSIONS: | PURPOSE: The study of angular kinetic data provides important information regarding muscle function and may lend insight into the etiology of overuse injuries common to runners. These injuries are often due to deviations in the secondary planes of motion. However, little is known about the angular kinetics in these planes leaving no reference for comparison. METHODS: Therefore, three-dimensional kinematic and ground reaction force data were collected on 20 recreational runners with normal rearfoot mechanics. RESULTS: Findings suggest that sagittal plane kinetic data were similar to the two-dimensional studies reported in the literature. Sagittal plane data were least variable (CV: 9.3-11.0%) and comprised the largest percentage of positive or negative work done (80.2-88.8%) at both the rearfoot and knee joints. Transverse plane kinetics were most variable (CV: 68.5-151.9%) and constituted the smallest percentage of work done at both joints (0.7-7.4%). CONCLUSIONS: | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Ferber R, Noehren B, Hamill J, Davis IS.** " | **Ferber R, Noehren B, Hamill J, Davis IS.** " | ||
Line 1188: | Line 1087: | ||
STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional experimental laboratory study. OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in running mechanics between runners who had previously sustained iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS) and runners with no knee-related running injuries. BACKGROUND: ITBS is the second leading cause of knee pain in runners and the most common cause of lateral knee pain. Despite its prevalence, few biomechanical studies have been conducted to better understand its aetiology. Because the iliotibial band has both femoral and tibial attachments, | STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional experimental laboratory study. OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in running mechanics between runners who had previously sustained iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS) and runners with no knee-related running injuries. BACKGROUND: ITBS is the second leading cause of knee pain in runners and the most common cause of lateral knee pain. Despite its prevalence, few biomechanical studies have been conducted to better understand its aetiology. Because the iliotibial band has both femoral and tibial attachments, | ||
[PMID: 20118523 Reference] | [PMID: 20118523 Reference] | ||
- | \\ | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | === Treadmills === | + | ==== Treadmills |
\\ | \\ | ||
**Sinclair J, Richards J, Taylor PJ, Edmundson CJ, Brooks D, Hobbs SJ. (2012)** | **Sinclair J, Richards J, Taylor PJ, Edmundson CJ, Brooks D, Hobbs SJ. (2012)** | ||
Line 1198: | Line 1096: | ||
Sports Biomech. 2013 Sep; | Sports Biomech. 2013 Sep; | ||
Studies investigating the mechanics of human movement are often conducted using the treadmill. The treadmill is an attractive device for the analysis of human locomotion. Studies comparing overground and treadmill running have analyzed discrete variables, however differences in excursion from footstrike to peak angle and range of motion during stance have yet to be examined. This study aimed to examine the 3-D kinematics of the lower extremities during overground and treadmill locomotion to determine the extent to which the two modalities differ. Twelve participants ran at 4.0m/s in both treadmill and overground conditions. 3-D angular kinematic parameters during the stance phase were collected using an eight camera motion analysis system. Hip, knee and ankle joint kinematics were quantified in the sagittal, coronal and transverse planes, then compared using paired t-tests. Of the parameters analyzed hip flexion at footstrike 12° hip range of motion 17°, peak hip flexion 12.7°, hip transverse plane range of motion 8° peak knee flexion 5° and peak ankle excursion range 6.6°, coronal plane ankle angle at toe-off 6.5° and peak ankle eversion 6.3° were found to be significantly different. These results lead to the conclusion that the mechanics of treadmill locomotion cannot be generalized to overground. | Studies investigating the mechanics of human movement are often conducted using the treadmill. The treadmill is an attractive device for the analysis of human locomotion. Studies comparing overground and treadmill running have analyzed discrete variables, however differences in excursion from footstrike to peak angle and range of motion during stance have yet to be examined. This study aimed to examine the 3-D kinematics of the lower extremities during overground and treadmill locomotion to determine the extent to which the two modalities differ. Twelve participants ran at 4.0m/s in both treadmill and overground conditions. 3-D angular kinematic parameters during the stance phase were collected using an eight camera motion analysis system. Hip, knee and ankle joint kinematics were quantified in the sagittal, coronal and transverse planes, then compared using paired t-tests. Of the parameters analyzed hip flexion at footstrike 12° hip range of motion 17°, peak hip flexion 12.7°, hip transverse plane range of motion 8° peak knee flexion 5° and peak ankle excursion range 6.6°, coronal plane ankle angle at toe-off 6.5° and peak ankle eversion 6.3° were found to be significantly different. These results lead to the conclusion that the mechanics of treadmill locomotion cannot be generalized to overground. | ||
- | \\ | + | |
**Altman AR, Reisman DS, Higginson JS, and Davis IS (2012)** "A Kinematic Comparison of Split-belt and Single-belt Treadmill Walking and the Effects of Accommodation" | **Altman AR, Reisman DS, Higginson JS, and Davis IS (2012)** "A Kinematic Comparison of Split-belt and Single-belt Treadmill Walking and the Effects of Accommodation" | ||
2012 - //Gait & Posture. 2012 February; 35(2): 287–291// | 2012 - //Gait & Posture. 2012 February; 35(2): 287–291// | ||
- | INTRODUCTION: | + | INTRODUCTION: |
- | \\ | + | |
**Lee SJ, and Hidler J** " | **Lee SJ, and Hidler J** " | ||
2007 - //Journal of Applied Physiology// | 2007 - //Journal of Applied Physiology// | ||
The goal of this study was to compare treadmill walking with overground walking in healthy subjects with no known gait disorders. Nineteen subjects were tested, where each subject walked on a split-belt instrumented treadmill as well as over a smooth, flat surface. Comparisons between walking conditions were made for temporal gait parameters such as step length and cadence, leg kinematics, joint moments and powers, and muscle activity. Overall, very few differences were found in temporal gait parameters or leg kinematics between treadmill and overground walking. Conversely, sagittal plane joint moments were found to be quite different, where during treadmill walking trials, subjects demonstrated less dorsiflexor moments, less knee extensor moments, and greater hip extensor moments. Joint powers in the sagittal plane were found to be similar at the ankle but quite different at the knee and hip joints. Differences in muscle activity were observed between the two walking modalities, particularly in the tibialis anterior throughout stance, and in the hamstrings, vastus medialis and adductor longus during swing. While differences were observed in muscle activation patterns, joint moments and joint powers between the two walking modalities, the overall patterns in these behaviors were quite similar. From a therapeutic perspective, | The goal of this study was to compare treadmill walking with overground walking in healthy subjects with no known gait disorders. Nineteen subjects were tested, where each subject walked on a split-belt instrumented treadmill as well as over a smooth, flat surface. Comparisons between walking conditions were made for temporal gait parameters such as step length and cadence, leg kinematics, joint moments and powers, and muscle activity. Overall, very few differences were found in temporal gait parameters or leg kinematics between treadmill and overground walking. Conversely, sagittal plane joint moments were found to be quite different, where during treadmill walking trials, subjects demonstrated less dorsiflexor moments, less knee extensor moments, and greater hip extensor moments. Joint powers in the sagittal plane were found to be similar at the ankle but quite different at the knee and hip joints. Differences in muscle activity were observed between the two walking modalities, particularly in the tibialis anterior throughout stance, and in the hamstrings, vastus medialis and adductor longus during swing. While differences were observed in muscle activation patterns, joint moments and joint powers between the two walking modalities, the overall patterns in these behaviors were quite similar. From a therapeutic perspective, | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Ine Van Caekenberghe, | **Ine Van Caekenberghe, | ||
2013 - //J. R. Soc. Interface 2013 10, 20130222// | 2013 - //J. R. Soc. Interface 2013 10, 20130222// | ||
Literature shows that running on an acceleratedmotorized treadmill is mechanically different from accelerated running overground. Overground, the subject has to enlarge the net anterior–posterior force impulse proportional to acceleration in order to overcome linearwhole body inertia, | Literature shows that running on an acceleratedmotorized treadmill is mechanically different from accelerated running overground. Overground, the subject has to enlarge the net anterior–posterior force impulse proportional to acceleration in order to overcome linearwhole body inertia, | ||
- | \\ | ||
- | **Ine Van Caekenberghe, | + | **Ine Van Caekenberghe, |
2013 - //Gait & Posture 38 (2013) 125–131// | 2013 - //Gait & Posture 38 (2013) 125–131// | ||
- | Unsteady state gait involving net accelerations has been studied overground and on a treadmill. Yet it has never been tested if and to what extent both set-ups are mechanically equal.\\ \\ This study documents the differences in ground reaction forces for accelerated running on an instrumented runway and running on an accelerating treadmill by building a theoretical framework which is experimentally put to the test.\\ \\ It is demonstrated that, in contrast to overground, no mean fore-after force impulse should be generated to follow an accelerating treadmill due to the absence of linear whole body acceleration. Accordingly, | + | Unsteady state gait involving net accelerations has been studied overground and on a treadmill. Yet it has never been tested if and to what extent both set-ups are mechanically equal. This study documents the differences in ground reaction forces for accelerated running on an instrumented runway and running on an accelerating treadmill by building a theoretical framework which is experimentally put to the test. It is demonstrated that, in contrast to overground, no mean fore-after force impulse should be generated to follow an accelerating treadmill due to the absence of linear whole body acceleration. Accordingly, |
- | \\ | + | |
**Whatman C, Hing W, Hume P.** " | **Whatman C, Hing W, Hume P.** " | ||
//Phys Ther Sport. 2011 Feb; | //Phys Ther Sport. 2011 Feb; | ||
- | PURPOSE: To investigate the within-day and between-day reliability of 3D lower extremity kinematics during five lower extremity functional screening tests and to assess the association between these kinematics and those recorded during jogging.\\ \\ METHODS: Peak three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics were quantified in 25 uninjured participants during five lower extremity functional tests and jogging. A nine camera motion analysis system (Qualysis Medical AB, Sweden) was used to capture three trials of all tests. All functional tests were repeated by 10 participants one to two days later. Visual 3D (C-Motion Inc, USA) and Labview were used to process all data. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and typical errors (TE) were used to assess within- and between-day reliability of all variables. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the association between peak joint kinematics during the functional tests and jogging.\\ \\ RESULTS: For the majority of kinematic variables the within-day reliability was excellent (ICC ≥ 0.92) and the between-day reliability was excellent to good (ICC ≥ 0.80). The correlation between kinematics of the functional tests and jogging was generally large to very large (r = 0.53 to 0.93).\\ \\ CONCLUSIONS: | + | PURPOSE: To investigate the within-day and between-day reliability of 3D lower extremity kinematics during five lower extremity functional screening tests and to assess the association between these kinematics and those recorded during jogging. METHODS: Peak three-dimensional lower extremity kinematics were quantified in 25 uninjured participants during five lower extremity functional tests and jogging. A nine camera motion analysis system (Qualysis Medical AB, Sweden) was used to capture three trials of all tests. All functional tests were repeated by 10 participants one to two days later. Visual 3D (C-Motion Inc, USA) and Labview were used to process all data. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and typical errors (TE) were used to assess within- and between-day reliability of all variables. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the association between peak joint kinematics during the functional tests and jogging. RESULTS: For the majority of kinematic variables the within-day reliability was excellent (ICC ≥ 0.92) and the between-day reliability was excellent to good (ICC ≥ 0.80). The correlation between kinematics of the functional tests and jogging was generally large to very large (r = 0.53 to 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: |
- | \\ | + | |
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | === Symmetry === | + | ==== Symmetry |
**Brown AM, Zifchock RA, Hillstrom HJ.(2014)** " | **Brown AM, Zifchock RA, Hillstrom HJ.(2014)** " | ||
// | // | ||
- | PURPOSE: To establish whether lower extremity limb dominance has an effect on overground running mechanics.\\ \\ BACKGROUND: In attempts to resolve unilateral pathology, physical therapists often use the restoration of symmetry as a clinical milestone. While lower limb dominance has been shown to affect lower extremity mechanics during dynamic tasks such as jump landing, its effect on running gait is poorly understood. Further, despite the role of fatigue in running mechanics and injury, the interaction between fatigue and limb dominance has yet to be examined.\\ \\ METHODS: Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic data were collected on 20 females during overground running. Data were collected prior-to and following a treadmill run to exertion. Dominant and non-dominant limb data were compared in the fresh-state using a paired t-test. A 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to test for an interaction between fatigue and limb dominance.\\ \\ RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the kinematic or kinetic patterns of the dominant and non-dominant lower extremities during fresh-state overground running. Fatigue was not shown to interact with limb dominance.\\ \\ CONCLUSION: Limb dominance did not affect kinematic or kinetic side-to-side differences. Therefore, physical therapists can continue to use resolution of lower extremity symmetry as a goal of therapy without having to account for limb dominance. The lack of an interaction between fatigue and limb dominance indicates that the dominant and non-dominant limbs fatigue at a similar rate. | + | PURPOSE: To establish whether lower extremity limb dominance has an effect on overground running mechanics. BACKGROUND: In attempts to resolve unilateral pathology, physical therapists often use the restoration of symmetry as a clinical milestone. While lower limb dominance has been shown to affect lower extremity mechanics during dynamic tasks such as jump landing, its effect on running gait is poorly understood. Further, despite the role of fatigue in running mechanics and injury, the interaction between fatigue and limb dominance has yet to be examined.METHODS: |
\\ | \\ | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | ==== Biomechanics and robotic devices: ==== | + | ===== Biomechanics and robotic devices: |
**Neckel ND, Blonien N, Nichols D, Hidler J** " | **Neckel ND, Blonien N, Nichols D, Hidler J** " | ||
Line 1241: | Line 1134: | ||
BACKGROUND: It is well documented that individuals with chronic stroke often exhibit considerable gait impairments that significantly impact their quality of life. While stroke subjects often walk asymmetrically, | BACKGROUND: It is well documented that individuals with chronic stroke often exhibit considerable gait impairments that significantly impact their quality of life. While stroke subjects often walk asymmetrically, | ||
[[http:// | [[http:// | ||
- | \\ | ||
**Gordon KE and Ferris DP** " | **Gordon KE and Ferris DP** " | ||
Line 1249: | Line 1141: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | ==== Seating ==== | + | ===== Seating |
\\ | \\ | ||
**Moore C, Nimbarte A, Rajulu S, Aghazadeh F. (2012)** | **Moore C, Nimbarte A, Rajulu S, Aghazadeh F. (2012)** | ||
Line 1257: | Line 1149: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | ==== Functional Screening ==== | + | ===== Functional Screening |
\\ | \\ | ||
**Whatman C, Hing W, Hume P. (2011)** | **Whatman C, Hing W, Hume P. (2011)** | ||
Line 1267: | Line 1159: | ||
CONCLUSIONS: | CONCLUSIONS: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
- | \\ | + | |
- | ==== XSens ==== | + | ===== XSens ===== |
- | \\ | + | |
**Blair S, Duthie G, Robertson S, Hopkins W, Ball K (2018)** | **Blair S, Duthie G, Robertson S, Hopkins W, Ball K (2018)** | ||
Concurrent validation of an inertial measurement system to quantify kicking biomechanics in four football codes | Concurrent validation of an inertial measurement system to quantify kicking biomechanics in four football codes | ||
Line 1276: | Line 1168: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | ==== Induced Acceleration Analysis ==== | + | ===== Induced Acceleration Analysis |
\\ | \\ | ||
**Kepple, T. Siegel , K., & Stanhope, S. (1997)** | **Kepple, T. Siegel , K., & Stanhope, S. (1997)** | ||
Line 1288: | Line 1180: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | [[#top|Back to Top]]\\ | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | ==== MOVE3D ==== | + | ===== MOVE3D |
\\ | \\ | ||
MOVE3D was the precursor to Visual3D and was part of a technology transfer from the NIH executed formally in 2001, following 3 years of collaborative work, between C-Motion and the NIH. The original implementation of the NIH MOVE3D software was based on the work Tom Kepple did as part of his Master' | MOVE3D was the precursor to Visual3D and was part of a technology transfer from the NIH executed formally in 2001, following 3 years of collaborative work, between C-Motion and the NIH. The original implementation of the NIH MOVE3D software was based on the work Tom Kepple did as part of his Master' | ||
Line 1326: | Line 1218: | ||
[[#top|Back to Top]] | [[#top|Back to Top]] | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | ==== AMASS ==== | + | ===== AMASS ===== |
\\ | \\ | ||
**Hansen C, Honeine JL, Gibas D, Rezzoug N, Gorce P and Isableu B (2012)** | **Hansen C, Honeine JL, Gibas D, Rezzoug N, Gorce P and Isableu B (2012)** |
visual3d/references.1731697277.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/11/15 19:01 by wikisysop